User talk:BrainwashersBackOff

Circular references

Thanks for contributing to the article Sivasankarapuram. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:15, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BrainwashersBackOff, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BrainwashersBackOff! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

account creation blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrainwashersBackOff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here

Hi Bbb23. I have been associated to an older account which has been blocked. I believe that with this new account I haven't done anything wrong. About the previous one, I apologize for not understanding properly the wikipedia policy, etc. I am willing to have my account back and keep helping the wikipedia community contributing to fix articles. It makes my time worthy. I hope you will be so kind to unblock it and give me the opportunity to continue helping. Thanks. BrainwashersBackOff (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Using multiple accounts in an attempt to sneak in a promotional article is against our rules. If this is how you intend to contribute to Wikipedia, we'll do fine without your help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(BrainwashersBackOff (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Hi NinjaRobotPirate, I believe I have been accused for something I did not do, yet again. I worked pretty hard on that article and there is not promotional purpose anywhere, for the references you requested I had to translate articles from several Danish Newspaper. In fact I keep not understanding why many NEW USERS are having TROUBLES TO BE ACCEPTED in your community. YOU say you VOLUNTEERING but if you behave like that I start to think that's quite the opposite. PEOPLE SHOULD BE FREE TO HELP! SO I AM ASKING YOU FOR WAY MORE EXPLANATIONS THAN THAT. ALSO I WOULD REALLY LIKE MY ACCOUNT BACK. I have been doing my best to help adjusting random articles, as you can see, written in a really bad English and often that didn't even deserve to be on the online encyclopedia. Yet again, I have been quite polite and comprehensive. You really do not give people second chances, do you? I do not believe you have never been wrong. Although, still one more time with FALSE EXPLANATIONS, my article has been rejected. Also my account has been blocked. Well, someone at least can tell me what can I do next? THANKS! BrainwashersBackOff (talk) 09:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MER-C, NinjaRobotPirate. hi Everyone, when you please stop being rude and declining my appeals in a personal way we can finally talk. Wikipedia has a policy of " DO NOT MAKE PERSONAL ATTACKS ANYWHERE ON WIKIPEDIA". Well, to me it looks like Bbb23 could block you two as well. For a misunderstanding I have been blocked, I do appeal and random users are being aggressive and not helpful like they suppose to. I don't know if you get paid for it (although I know it should be volunteering) or either you just like being exclusive on wikipedia but I definitely did not do anything wrong. I have been accused of "promotional article" and I do not even know the Artist I was writing about, it was just a try. I do work in the Hospitality industry and like everyone else here I do love encyclopedias, I always did since I was a Kid. Eventually I just tried. I understand I do need a good reason to have my account back, I gave many, You do need a good reason too to decline my appeals. Surely NinjaRobotPirate and MER-C havent't talk to be in encyclopedic words but in a personal way. Everyone who obviously is not a vandal should have the right to volunteer on WIKIPEDIA. It's a RIGHT and as long I can I will fight for it. I never thought wikipedia world could be like that. Please show me I was wrong and it's just silly misunderstandings. Thanks for your time. BrainwashersBackOff (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your persistent disruptive edits on this page, I have revoked TPA. If you do the same thing at the master account talk page, I will revoke TPA there as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]