User talk:BrainSpecialist
Love music.
Put something here, man
[edit]Like, in this section - if you've got something to say!
Your submission at AfC Template:Colour Haze was accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
- sms- talk 10:08, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for July 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Film director, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kes and Jaws. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Dan Clews (August 8)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:Dan Clews and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! BrainSpecialist,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ArcAngel (talk) ) 01:38, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
|
Non-free images on Wikipedia
[edit]Hello, regarding non-free images on Wikipedia, they need to be low resolution. Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria states that there should be minimal extent of use: "Low- rather than high-resolution/fidelity/bit rate is used (especially where the original could be used for deliberate copyright infringement). This rule also applies to the copy in the File: namespace." Wikipedia cannot host film poster images that are much larger than what is shown in the given infobox. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:00, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- I've reverted the high-resolution changes made at All Over Me (film) and Human Traffic. However, I did notice that the latter article had a very blurry image. What you could do is re-size what you initially uploaded but with a width of 270 so it is still low-resolution but more detailed than the oldest version. The replacement for All Over Me could be restored too if the image you uploaded is also re-sized similarly. Let me know if you have any questions. If you're like to discuss the approach to poster images on Wikipedia, we can start a discussion at WT:FILM. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:10, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Human Traffic theatrical release poster.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Human Traffic theatrical release poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Draft:Template:Dan Clews concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Dan Clews, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Template:Dan Clews
[edit]
Hello BrainSpecialist. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Template:Dan Clews".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Template:Dan Clews}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 01:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, BrainSpecialist. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)