User talk:Bradyb0412

June 2024

Hello, Bradyb0412. I noticed that your recent edit to Odostomia lukisii added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, The Queen's Commonwealth Trust. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. An edit that you recently made to Therapsida seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 00:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ogeechee, Georgia

The article Ogeechee, Georgia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this place meets WP:NPLACE, no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 04:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ogeechee, Georgia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ogeechee, Georgia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogeechee, Georgia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 11:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buist Tract moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Buist Tract. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:35, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bradyb0412! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Significa liberdade (talk) 23:29, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:36, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Commercial Bank, New York moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to First Commercial Bank, New York. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1 World Trade Center (1971–2001), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pure Energy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Science, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 03:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only changed it to American English Bradyb0412 (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There was absolutely no reason for you to have done that. Remsense ‥ 论 19:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do important articles have to to be British? Bradyb0412 (talk) 20:29, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#National varieties of English. Remsense ‥ 论 20:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But science isn't a location.

British and American people spell science in the same way. Is there something about science that makes it British? If not, then if science is done internationally, then should it matter what dialect of English we should be talking about it in? Science wasn't only developed in the UK. Bradyb0412 (talk) 19:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy linked. Remsense ‥ 论 19:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Bradyb0412 (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I'm sorry. Bradyb0412 (talk) 21:25, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Glad I could help. Remsense ‥ 论 21:30, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So

Does Wikipedia have to be British? Bradyb0412 (talk) 20:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Data mining in agriculture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caelus

Hi Bradyb0412, can I ask what your reasoning was for moving the page Caelus to Caelus (Roman god)? I don't see any need to disambiguate here; there isn't any other "Caelus" covered on Wikipedia. – Michael Aurel (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and now to Caelus (mythology)? – Michael Aurel (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've had it moved back to Caelus. If you think it should have a different title, please start a WP:Requested move. – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Fram (talk) 08:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 12:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear UtherSRG,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bradyb0412 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was only diacritical changes. The archipelago, even in English, is commonly referred to as "The Galápagos Islands." I was also going to include "also known as." For consistency with the titles of other articles, such as "Galápagos tortoise", I decided to add the diacritic. changeBradyb0412 (talk) 22:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't responded to Deepfriedokra's post in 2 weeks. I am declining this unblock request, and encourage you to make a new one where you describe what actions led to you being blocked, what you would do differently, and how you would avoid problems in the future. PhilKnight (talk) 15:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bradyb0412 (talk) 22:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's just one of several incidents, I'm afraid. Please describe what actions led to you being blocked, what you would do differently, and how you would avoid problems in the future.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I should have focused more on the articles themselves than their titles, and to avoid future blocks, I would fix articles instead of titles. Also, I respect not only various dialects of English, but other languages, and the title is just what the topic is most commonly referred to as. Although I have been a disruptive editor, it's time for my edits to be less disruptive. It may sound tempting to be disruptive in certain situations, but there is more bad than good in disruptive edits. There were many incidents when I did this, but my edits were too disruptive, so I got banned. In the meantime, I worked on other wikis, and learned, not just about to topics of the articles, but about how those articles are made. I know disruptive editing isn't as bad as vandalism, but it is still bad. I'm sorry for my actions, and will make my edits less disruptive. Bradyb0412 (talk) 06:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG, I admit I haven't looked into this one much, but one month on the first block is pretty long. They're about halfway through, now - long enough? -- asilvering (talk) 01:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They haven't been able to formulate a proper unblock request statement. I don't think they yet understand. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at my "Apology" message. That is my unblock request. Bradyb0412 (talk) 01:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please describe what actions led to you being blocked, what you would do differently, and how you would avoid problems in the future. Do you believe that's what you have done in your "apology"? - UtherSRG (talk) 01:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Bradyb0412 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please read my apology Bradyb0412 (talk) 17:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please read my apology [[User:Bradyb0412|Bradyb0412]] ([[User talk:Bradyb0412#top|talk]]) 17:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please read my apology [[User:Bradyb0412|Bradyb0412]] ([[User talk:Bradyb0412#top|talk]]) 17:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please read my apology [[User:Bradyb0412|Bradyb0412]] ([[User talk:Bradyb0412#top|talk]]) 17:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}