User talk:Bradlen

Welcome!

Hello, Bradlen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Luksuh 17:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, JEAN-CHARLES GILLE-MAISANI, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť^(Talk) 20:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please add a Category:Graphology tag at the bottom of the page, when you add graphologists to Wikipedia, or make nay other contributions from your graphological repository. jonathon 22:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, when you add biographies of graphologists, would you please use the biography infobox at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template:Infobox_Biography.jonathon 02:23, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

The formatting in the Puvler biography is weird. I'll fix it up later. I'll also add a synopsis of both major symbolism, and minor symbolism to that page. jonathon 15:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

When you create biographies, would you please follow the guidelines at WPP:BIO.jonathon 16:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Computer Assisted Self Interviewing

A tag has been placed on Computer Assisted Self Interviewing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 14:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Market Research Society

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Market Research Society, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.marketresearch.org.uk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joan Cambridge

The article Joan Cambridge has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DrStrauss talk 17:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joan Cambridge

The article Joan Cambridge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ANYBIO due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 19:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Max Pulver

The article Max Pulver has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Max Pulver for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Pulver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Pulver until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

VdSV9•♫ 15:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]