User talk:BraEpreSS

Paid editing

Hi. Please see WP:PAID, it is necessary to declare who is paying you for editing here.

I've moved your article to Draft:Chief Sielu (1). Please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, giving attribution to the original author of the text is necessary. Your text is the same as Draft:Chief Sielu. You can then submit Draft:Chief Sielu for review.

– Thjarkur (talk) 07:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Þjarkur, Thanks for your message. I am not paid to create this. I never knew there was an existing draft. I have seen the old draft. I dicovered the issues on it. I have reworked it properly and I am submitting it for the review process while deleting my own draft. I also gave credits to the original author. I never knew him or her. Thank u!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chief Sielu has been accepted

Chief Sielu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 09:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Archiedesai per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Archiedesai. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:49, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]