User talk:BrBrLeJa

Welcome!

Hello, BrBrLeJa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Geraldo Perez. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Good Luck Charlie episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. All information about unaired episodes must have a reference so that others can verify what was added. You must say where you got the info and provide a link to it. If you saw the episode in some manner before it is officially broadcast, please hold off adding any details until everyone else has a chance to see it. See also WP:RS and WP:V for more. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you getting some references but the one you used is a private blog by some unknown person so does not have a reputation for fact checking that is required to meet the standards in reliable source. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to List of Good Luck Charlie episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (talk) 05:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Shake It Up episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Shake It Up episodes was changed by BrBrLeJa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908457 on 2012-09-13T06:04:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ShowFax is planning information used primarily to cast shows. The information contained there is preliminary and may and occasionally does change between what is planned and what is actually in the completed show. It is generally discouraged as a source of information about what will be broadcast. Best to use official guides such as TV Guide, Futon Critic or Zap2it as sources of episode titles and production codes. ClueBot triggered on using ShowFax in links and is likely why your edits were reverted. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BrBrLeJa, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BrBrLeJa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Dog with a Blog episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. When somebody removes unsourced content, you need to provide an inline citation supporting the content when restoring it. AussieLegend (✉) 14:01, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good Luck Charlie

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Good Luck Charlie episodes, you will be blocked from editing.

85.101.209.62 (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of Good Luck Charlie episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please note, this is a courtesy notice. You have actually breached 3RR already. AussieLegend (✉) 16:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, BrBrLeJa. You have new messages at Talk:List of Good Luck Charlie episodes.
Message added 17:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--AussieLegend (✉) 17:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Jessie episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peyton List (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Jessie episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:53, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Good Luck Charlie episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:33, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 days for repeatign the same edits you made under an IP address that got that address (User:70.190.10.219) blocked. ~~After that IP was blocked, you hopped on your named account and repeated the disruption in violation of WP:MOS.~~ You can see more details on the talk page of that IP address. Note that if you attempt to use more than one account again to evade your block, I'll reblock you for significantly longer. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Qwyrxian (talk) 04:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have stuck part of the block notice. I see that I had my times wrong: the duplicated improper edit from this account was before the block on the IP, so I see that you weren't evading the block on the IP. I'm going to reduce the block on this account by 24 hours accordingly. My apologies. Nonetheless, the underlying reason for the block remains the same--you're edit warring in ways directly opposed to the MOS. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Shake It Up episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GLCFan1 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]