User talk:Boykovladimir

Welcome!

Hello, Boykovladimir, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 23:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boykovladimir and welcome! I notice you have just started contributing to Wikipedia. You may find it useful to get acquainted with some of the rules before you add any more to the articles, in particular the policies Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Good luck! 14:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes. You added a paragraph and an external link to essay mill that violates the neutral point of view policy. I have undone these changes. Please read the policy before you continue to edit. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unverifiable references

Hi, the references you have provided (eg Johansson, 2001) are too vague to allow for them to be verified. Please provide full references, otherwise the material you added may have to be deleted/userfied. Please see conversations about your edits on Talk:William_Blake#.27London.27 and Wikipedia:Village_pump_(assistance)/Archive_4#How_to_handle_-_users_essay_style_writing_.26_vague_cites thanks -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 18:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article that you created have been userfied to User:Boykovladimir/Taiwan Language policy, User:Boykovladimir/Cyclical Products, User:Boykovladimir/Mature Products. The unverifiable information you have added to other articles will be deleted. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 14:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Essay. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 21:01, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see that I've wasted my time clearing up the damage you've caused, hence -

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Quarterly Essay, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 21:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Quarterly Essay, you will be blocked from editing. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 21:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Term Paper, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. -- John (Daytona2 · Talk · Contribs) 21:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]