User talk:Bowesdd

Autobiography

I notice that you started the article on David Bowes. Your username leads me to suspect that this may be an autobiographical article. If so, you should have a look at WP:AUTO. In short, writing about yourself is strongly discouraged; the general policy is that you should allow others to do it. fbb_fan 00:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, please refrain from editing the article on David Bowes, I see you made edits in 2017 again. Jooojay (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Joojay, Bowesdd (talk) 11:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of David Bowes

An editor has nominated David Bowes, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bowes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Reunion.com. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. – Alex43223^{T | C | E} 07:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucio Amelio (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucio Amelio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Kethrus |talk to me 02:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bowesdd, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Kethrus |talk to me 02:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. Material cited will be resubmitted with links / etc. Bowesdd (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lucio Amelio concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lucio Amelio, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. Material cited will be resubmitted with links / etc. Bowesdd (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC) Bowesdd (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucio Amelio

Hello, Bowesdd. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Lucio Amelio".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:49, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. Material cited will be resubmitted with links / etc. Bowesdd (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC) Bowesdd (talk) 23:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

messages addressed to user:bowesdd

Thank you for your attention. Material cited will be resubmitted with links / etc. Bowesdd (talk) 23:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]