User talk:Bottlesofsmoke
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Bottlesofsmoke! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Kmhkmh (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Over-linking
[edit]Please take a moment to read MOS:OL. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- although the page you linked seems to provide relatively clear examples, the lack of consistency (to say the least) across the site stands in stark contract to the aforementioned, therefore making it difficult at best to determine what is and isn't overlinking (to say nothing of the fact that making multiple edits at a time seems to qualify as well)
- obviously Wikipedia is a large site. there are many, many articles, and it would be very hard to keep them format/syntax/etc consistent, even without the nature of the site being crowdsourced edits. that said, in my opinion, the vast majority of the time links are useful for those reading the page, as I would guess a large percentage (if not the majority) of the views on the majority of pages are from people who are not experts in whatever they happen to be reading about. also, it's just plain annoying; new editors spend a lot of time on our edits (if only due to inexperience with the site), and I'd wager most of us feel like we are helping, so when our edits are thrown away for what seems like triviality at best adn pedantic snobbish hypocrisy at worst, it discourages us and scares us off. I don't know what to do about this, and obviously I'm not blaming you or users like you: like I said, it's probably just due to the nature of the site. just my two cents, or something. Bill Lumbergh (talk) 06:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
March 2024
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Eden Hazard, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per MOS:OL. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- although the page you linked seems to provide relatively clear examples, the lack of consistency (to say the least) across the site stands in stark contract to the aforementioned, therefore making it difficult at best to determine what is and isn't overlinking (to say nothing of the fact that making multiple edits at a time seems to qualify as well)
- obviously Wikipedia is a large site. there are many, many articles, and it would be very hard to keep them format/syntax/etc consistent, even without the nature of the site being crowdsourced edits. that said, in my opinion, the vast majority of the time links are useful for those reading the page, as I would guess a large percentage (if not the majority) of the views on the majority of pages are from people who are not experts in whatever they happen to be reading about. also, it's just plain annoying; new editors spend a lot of time on our edits (if only due to inexperience with the site), and I'd wager most of us feel like we are helping, so when our edits are thrown away for what seems like triviality at best adn pedantic snobbish hypocrisy at worst, it discourages us and scares us off. I don't know what to do about this, and obviously I'm not blaming you or users like you: like I said, it's probably just due to the nature of the site. just my two cents, or something. Bill Lumbergh (talk) 06:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)