User talk:Botteghe Oscure

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Ann Tighe (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Darylgolden was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Ann Tighe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 04:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 04:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content on your draft

Hello, based on your promotional writing on your draft, one might come to the conclusion that you either admire the person very much, or are affiliated with, or paid by the person to write an article about them. If the first of these is true, please work on making the article neutral. If the last two are true, also make the article neutral, but in addition, you must declare your conflict of interest with that person. To do that, go to your user page, and type a short sentence declaring your conflict of interest with that person. A sentence like "I am affiliated with ABC topic to write an article" or "I have been paid by ABC person/company an article" would be fine. Please also read our guide for editors with a conflict of interest. Thank you. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 04:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Ann Tighe has been accepted

Mary Ann Tighe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To Joseph2302, thank you so much for your help on the Mary Ann TIghe Wikipedia page

Joseph2302, I just want to thank you for your work on the Mary Ann Tighe article. This was my first and I appreciate your help so much.

Not sure who to ask this to -- there's a "flag" at the top of the article that says it's an orphan, but the article about Cardinal Spellman H.S. in the Bronx now links to it, so does that mean it's no longer an "orphan" -- ? Any insight you can provide would be great.

Thanks again. Botteghe Oscure (talk) 01:18, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed For future reference, you are allowed to remove tags if they no longer apply, which this one didn't. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great to know -- thank you again -- you are so helpful! Botteghe Oscure (talk) 01:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]