User talk:Boston2austin

Asbestos ref

In this edit you replaced a link to what you called a law site with a link to environmental chemistry. This is the website you said was a law site. I didn't realize it was a offering legal service until now, but I re-added the ref because I still think the source is reliable. Thanks, Xpanzion 05:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know they are sites associated with law firms, the point I am trying to make is that some of their information is worthy of inclusion. For example, what is wrong with using their information on the history of asbestos? I'll be more careful with what I use, when I originally used those sites as references I did not realize they were associated with law firms.Xpanzion 15:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SV40

We might need your input on SV40 again. Thanks.--Filll (talk) 16:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:69.143.202.246. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DiverseMentality (talk) 03:22, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacking an editor, even if this person is a vandal, is not acceptable here on Wikipedia. Whenever you see a high amount of vandalism on a page, simply request for the page to be protected. Never attack another person, no matter how badly their vandalize. If you have any questions, just read up on attacking and move on from there. DiverseMentality (talk) 03:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could not agree more with the above comments. Boston2austin, please refrain from that in the future. Furthermore, please abide by the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule in the future. Failue to do so can result in being blocked from editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.201.247.20 (talk) 13:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey loser you vandalized the same page how many times over the last two years? Get a life. You're pathetic. Oh and sign your comments retard. Boston2austin (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how do i sign my edits? i have never done that, but strangly enough, after a day or two some sort of bot puts in my IP... Also why do you continue to attack me personally?

You just don't get it do you? You have an addiction to vandalizing and manipulating content on Wikipedia and it's not funny at all. I love Wikipedia and when someone like you wants to destroy what I love, I have every right to make you feel my frustration. I don't care about Duncan, Oklahoma in fact I only came across the page while looking for someone I knew. I only began to take an interest in it when I read what was in the article and realized you had VANDALIZED THE PAGE OVER A PERIOD OF NEARLY TWO YEARS USING 3-4 IP addresses. I try to correct things especially cries for attention like yours and most of the time the vandal doesn't return. However given the sad and boring life you must live, you continue to vandalize the page as a desperate plea for attention that makes you look even more pitiful. You can read Wikipedia all you want but don't make another edit unless you plan on doing it in good faith. Boston2austin (talk) 22:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"..destroy what I love.." wow, where to go from here.... i guess we are done here. i will say it one last time..... agree to disagree.

as far as the future goes, i will not stop poking fun at my old home town. but i will stop talking to you if you wish.

Well no problem I'll put in a protection request for Duncan for 6 months or so. BYE Boston2austin (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance

I've asked admins to look into the situation here: [1] --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 04:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected Duncan, Oklahoma again for a while. I'll be watching the IP also. Kevin (talk) 05:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Credit Report Comparison AFD Comment

Hi there, I appreciate your comments regarding this AfD, but I think there is a major difference between the list in question and your examples like Dog Grooming Services in Dallas. The article up for deletion contains a comparison of web sites that are mostly notable by wikipedia standards. The dog grooming list would be deleted immediately because it would be a comparison of non-notable things. I would not support inclusion of comparison charts for non-notable subjects. Amazinglarry (talk) 12:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation

I have nominated Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TN X Man 15:50, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Back Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GNC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Boston2austin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Boston2austin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]