User talk:Bosna

Sockpuppet question

I can guarantee you these two users you mentioned are not sockpuppets of each other. One of them is even an admin. Regarding Ew's reverts, these have more to do with the temporary injunction on Kosovo, imposed by the Arbitration Committee, than anything else. You are a new user and editing a very controversial topic, so it is more than natural that many people are suspicious, willing to revert on sight. I would suggest you discuss any changes beforehand at Talk:Kosovo. Regards, Asterion^talk 07:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do they mark significant edits with m ? Usually when people do that they are warned not to. Bosna 03:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bosna, not really sure as I am not an administrator but I believe that reverts made using the administrator's revert button are automatically marked as minor. In any case, you may want to ask Naconkantari directly if you have any complains. Regards, Asterion^talk 17:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!!

You're already an experienced editor - and it's a shere shame that you haven't been welcomed before. So here it is:

Welcome!

Hello, Bosna, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --PaxEquilibrium 19:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

check Srebrenica article

Bosna, I notice that you have not been editing lately. Are you still active? You may want to take an interest in the Srebrenica article. I am looking for editors who will stop the Srebrenica article's intro from being partially deleted. I believe it is important that the intro communicates clearly and comprehensively what happened. One thing though, it is best to stay calm. I noticed that on the Kosovo article you got pretty upset. I understand. I know that it is a sensitive subject. I would really appreciate it if you would help with the Srebrenica article, but it is important that we do our best to present our case without too much acrimony. If we have enough editors dedicated to preserving the truth of what happened in Srebrenica and communicating that clearly and we remain steady, then we will be OK. Thank you for your consideration. Fairview360 05:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]