User talk:Born Acorn

Hello Born Acorn. My name is KnowledgeOfSelf on Wikipedia, but you can call me Steve if you'd like. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I just stopped by to say hi and formally welcome you to Wikipedia.

Here are a few good links for newcomers. I know that they can be boring, but I recommend that you take a look at them:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can come to my talk page if you have any questions. If I can help I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Or you can go to, Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes this will automatically produce your name and the date. Again, welcome! Have fun! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk. 22:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

prove it

Welcome for me as well. Your edits are of very good quality but I have the gravest doubts about Wrexham Shropshire and Marylebone Railway. Please provide some evidence. -- RHaworth 23:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes. Here it is BBC News. Originally the information was only in the Local newspaper but was featured on national (Welsh) news channels last night. Born Acorn 12:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! -- RHaworth 21:08, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya

Hi, As the other (known) person from Yale i just wanted to say hi before they block our IP. If so i guess we'll just have to use a different proxy server. Anyway see ya round the wikiverse. Pydos 15:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pigeons

Don't you agree? orudge 20:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not. Born Acorn 10:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on editing

Keep on editing. --RCT Locomotion Wikipedia 21:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrexham and Minera Branch

Hi Born Acorn

Although I hesitate to disagree with one living on the spot, you might like to see my comments on the talk page of the article. My first point is that this was actually a railway (the Wrexham and Minera Railway) and not a branch, although it did of course become such when the GWR took it over, I agree. The Ian Allen Pre-Grouping Atlas show the area to be a very complicated one, rail-wise, and am Ordnance Survey map (1947 issue) I have of the area makes that even clearer. The trackbeds are all visible on the modern maps (I used streetmap).

The records I have quoted make it clear that it wasn't just a single track, but one of two branches - the Minera line to the southwest (which became completely GWR-owned) and the joint line north towards Mold and its triangular junction at Coed Talon. The latter was only joint as far as Llanfynydd, as I say in my note. On the Minera branch, the stopping places were - Plas Power, Brymbo and Coed Poeth excepted which were a full stations - halts and were, in order from Wrexham:

Gatewen Halt
Pentre Broughton Halt
Plas Power
The Lodge Halt
Brymbo
here was the junction for the joint line, the stations on which were:
- Ffrith
- Llanfynydd
the Minerva branch:
Brymbo West Crossing Halt
Pentresaeson Halt
Coed Poeth
Vicarage Crossing Halt
Berwig Halt

I have a note that passenger traffic was withdrawn from Croesnewydd (?) to Berwig Halt on 1 January 1931.Much of what I say above is taken from,the fact that I have a large collection of Railway Magazine (1921- 1972). I obviously copied out a map of the W&MR in one of the articles, but omitted to give its origin!

I hope you can agree that the article doesn't quite follow the history I have outlined! Regards Peter Shearan 13:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes. You'll have to excuse me, I was a complete wikinoob at the time (only 7 months ago too!) and just thought it would be *cool* to add the information I knew as a stub. I ended up adding some random tidbits I found, and the article became more of a mess than anything else. It should be fully re-written with all the information in the article that I dug out of local history books I found lying around the house. Born Acorn 00:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Coedpoethstation.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Coedpoethstation.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then you need to specify who owns the copyright, please. If you got it from a website, then a link to the website where it was taken from with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Flyingtoaster1337 12:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WSMRlogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:WSMRlogo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AC Best 23:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Leaderlogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Leaderlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ellesmere Canal Ffrwd branch

Hi there, I've replied to your comment on the talk page for Moss Valley, Wrexham. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmallett (talk • contribs) 11:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Chrissawyer.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Chrissawyer.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chrissawyer.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chrissawyer.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blitzkrieg2packshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blitzkrieg2packshot.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WSMRlogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WSMRlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dvw.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dvw.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Bersham Colliery, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Johnstown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mvbarfleur.jpg

I am a webmaster a ferry site. I was wondering if I could have permission to use your image File:Mvbarfleur.jpg in my site. Many thanks 2013harry 13:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2013harry (talk • contribs)

Hi, yes this is absolutely fine! Born Acorn (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 2013harry 09:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2013harry (talk • contribs)

Nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Edwards and Son for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Edwards and Son is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Edwards and Son until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 21:33, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mineralimeworks.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mineralimeworks.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dvw.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dvw.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]