User talk:Boricuaqueen

June 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hot sauce seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Original Pique Sauce (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Original Pique Sauce and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Original Pique Sauce, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Boricuaqueen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:10, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Original Pique Sauce

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Original Pique Sauce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:11, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why your draft was deleted

Hello. An administrator deleted your draft article for the following reason: (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

To show that a topic is notable enough for inclusion, we require significant coverage already exists from sources that are both reliable and independent. Significant coverage means that the topic has been discussed in-depth by the writer. A source is considered reliable if it has an established reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight, e.g. mainstream academic press, major news outlets, major magazines, etc. An source is independent if has no affiliation with the topic being discussed. It is also necessary to describe the topic from a neutral point of view, as if the writer has no personal interest in the topic.

There were problems with the sources you used:

https://www.donricardosauce.com/index.html - This is the subject's own website, making it a primary source. While this is OK for providing basic facts and figures, any interpretation of those facts is not acceptable. Also, a primary source alone cannot establish the topic's notability.
https://hotsaucefever.com/hotsauce/don-ricardo-sauce-co-original-pique/ - This appears to be a blog that consists of user-submitted content. Because this lacks editorial oversight, it falls under the category of a self-published source and therefore considered unreliable. This also disqualifies the overwhelming majority of social media sites.
https://superble.com/explore/central-america-brings-the-heat-with-their-hot-sauces/3821 - There is only a brief mention of this product, so it lacks the depth of coverage that is required.

In addition, the tone of the article sounded a bit more like a sales pitch instead of a plainly factual description from the required neutral point of view. Perhaps this was not your intention, but that was the overall effect. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draft

Hello, I recently moved an article you created from Don Ricardo Sauce Co. to Draft:Don Ricardo Sauce Co.. I have conducted this action as 1) the article does not fully comply with WP:MOS; 2) seems to be similar to an article recently deleted by an administer; and 3) may not meet Wikipedia's standard for inclusion (WP:NCORP).--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Hello, Boricuaqueen. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Don Ricardo Sauce Co.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Don Ricardo Sauce Co., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Don Ricardo Sauce Co.

Hello, Boricuaqueen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Don Ricardo Sauce Co.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 04:14, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]