User talk:Boopathiss
A tag has been placed on Vaarisoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fan-1967 14:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vaarisoft to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andante1980 12:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Vaarisoft requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 12:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008
[edit]Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Vaarisoft, you will be blocked from editing. Redfarmer (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Vaarisoft. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Redfarmer (talk) 12:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page, as you did with Vaarisoft, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Redfarmer (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:VaariSoft-Logo.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:VaariSoft-Logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Corporations
[edit]Please read our guidelines at WP:COMPANY. Companies which don't meet these guidelines will not generally have articles here; there are tens of millions of companies on this planet, and not all of them are notable enough for their own article in Wikipedia. You have been trying to get an article about this company (one you work for, perhaps?) for two years now, and your efforts have consistently failed to meet our standards. Please concern yourself, instead, with improving many of the less-than-perfect articles here, especially those in areas where you have particular expertise. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:38, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Boopathiss.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Boopathiss.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)