Jump to content

User talk:Bookbuddi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can I suggest that you use the talk page at Telegrapher's equations to make suggestions before changing the article. You are making a lot of factual mistakes and I'm not convinced that you know a lot about this subject. If you do want to edit the article directly you should take your information from a reliable source and cite it with the material you add. SpinningSpark 17:12, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you the expert, you also presented incorrect facts. I got the facts about the inverse square law from wikipedia. I know what I am talking about because I am a reliable source until proved otherwise, so I don't need to ask for suggestions, and bad edits are not shown in the article for long, and people should know the risks about accurate information from wikipedia or any other source, tomorrow we may discover something new Bookbuddi (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly don't know what you are talking about. Now you are trying to edit war your incorrect ideas into another article, Voyager program, [1][2][3][4] and had to be reverted by another editor. Guessing and hoping someone else will correct it is not acceptable. It took me 10 seconds to google a reliable source with the correct information on dish antennae and the inverse square law [5]. Now that you are disrupting multiple editors your WP:COMPETENCE may need to be dealt with more strongly if it continues. You are not a reliable source and neither are other Wikipedia articles, please use proper sources in future. Please read WP:V which will explain this; it is a core policy and not optional or negotiable. SpinningSpark 22:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will add the new information about the inverse square law here Inverse-square_law Bookbuddi (talk) 22:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dani Harmer because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]