User talk:BongBing321

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, this block is for repeated unsourced edits on a BLP and this edit which contained a slur. EvergreenFir (talk) 03:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've upped the duration to indefinite. BongBing321, you've conducted yourself in a manner that is simply too problematic for us to tolerate on the project. El_C 04:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BongBing321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t see why I am the one being blocked here. I was undoing false and defamatory edits and provided sources to Mr. Fuentes’s own words. Sorry for the slur. I got heated and lashed out because of others (particularly Grayfell’s) repeated edits directly contrary to citations.BongBing321 (talk) 15:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

this edit alone is worthy of your indefinite block. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BongBing321 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i apologized for the mass deletion edit. I got frustrated by the repeated false edits contrary to citations. Wouldn’t anyone get frustrated when a few motivated actors repeatedly undo edits that are patently false and even fail to provide their own sources for said edits?BongBing321 (talk) 02:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If that's what you do when you get frustrated, then you won't be able to participate in this project. Frustration is not uncommon on Wikipedia, but this is a collaborative project where working with others in a civil and respectful manner is required. You need to be able to handle any frustration in a way that is still respectful of others, and language like you used in your edit simply is not part of this collaborative environment. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 02:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.