User talk:Bonanihazarika28

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bonanihazarika28. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bonanihazarika28|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
• there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

More

Although you gave what appeared to be an impressive list of references, most are press releases, interviews with your management or are otherwise either associated with your company or not acceptable sources. Pleas read notability guidelines

• there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites. Yours is littered with spamlinks

• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: extensive holdings... build ventures from scratch, invest, expand operations and increase their footprint.... built businesses with leading companies... to become the number one ad marketing player in India... flagship brands... one of the most successful exits in the field of advertising technology in India... Their offerings... claim to have one of the largest client bases in the Indian media technology sector with 700+ monthly active advertiser campaigns locally, as well as international clients across Indonesia, Dubai, and China... and so on

• there isn't single wikilink in the entire article, which was largely created in a single edit. Makes be wonder if this has been cut-and-pasted from somewhere?sells, little about the company organisation itself other than locations. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits. You also don't seem to have any criticism of the company, unsurprising since it's largely sourced from its own press releases.

You asked if I would restore the text,but you have already posted Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#Smile Group. Please don't make the same request in more than one place Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:24, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the paid editor declaration. You will appreciate that that doesn't mean that you can write what you like, it just means you won't be blocked as an undeclared paid editor. Let's see what happens at Requests for Undeletion. If it's restored there, then you just need to fix the draft (You should move it to draft even if it's not restored there). If it's refused there, let me know and I'll restore a somewhat cleaned up version, but you have to wait for RuD first Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:30, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

I should add that it's likely to be rejected there, since it was a WP:G11 deletion, read the blurb at the top of that page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:34, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

@Jimfbleak: The draft of the page has been restored. I will incorporate the suggestions made by you and submit the draft for review later. Thank you so much for the valuable inputs. Bonanihazarika28 (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smile Group (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Smile Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Smile Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Bonanihazarika28! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 08:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)