User talk:Boljom
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Boljom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Malerooster (talk) 03:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
BLP/N posting
[edit]You may be interested in this. a13ean (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk pages
[edit]Please join the discussion at the article's talk page rather than just reverting. Thanks, a13ean (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Unification church - neutrality
[edit]Hi, I appreciate your undid on the article as I think likewise, that wording as cult or sect are not neutral. I had same troubles in Czech version of the article and there was a great edit war - and until now, there are nasty words in introduction of the article. Question to you is how the police of the EN Wikipedia see that and if it is possible to extend it to the Czech version as general principle. Thank you in advance for any kind of advice. --DeeMusil (talk) 12:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Watch the documentary about Wikipedia "Wikipedia:Truth in numbers?". Then, make a strategy. Then, follow it till the end. You'll win it because your intentions are NOT ill-creative as intentions ARE of your otherwise-thinking wiki colleagues. Good luck and God bless.Boljom (talk) 23:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. Movie is great but probably will not help. I think, nothing will help at this time as there are several pro-anticultic authors targeting on my edits in general and I did a mistake by commneting things and edits (not their authors) by their real names, and ... truth can be easily muted in despotic regimes. Better would be to retreat, let the smelly small POV cz version to its destiny and later, after all those wikidie from "no opposition", rewrite it from a scratch as a en-cz translation (again). It is shameful, that czech Wikipedia have no tool to promote neutrality and it harms the project good name and reliability for sure. Thank you again and God bless. --DeeMusil (talk) 14:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
January 2013
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Zad68 01:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥ 03:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)