User talk:Bogdano2

GOOOH - Get Out of Our House

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article GOOOH - Get Out of Our House, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Metropolitan90 06:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of GOOOH - Get Out of Our House

An article that you have been involved in editing, GOOOH - Get Out of Our House, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOOOH - Get Out of Our House. Thank you. Metropolitan90 03:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy again

OK so you have got a couple of media references but I do not think that GOOOH has actually increased significantly in notability in just two months. You have a democratic right to raise the matter at deletion review but in the mean time, i am very tempted to say: Get Out of Our Encyclopedia. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The references I added are a published book as well as an article in a major newspaper. There are many radio interviews and many more blogs discussing this out on the Internet. You can see partial lists at http://www.goooh.com/ViewArticle.aspx?ID=23 . There are many articles on Wikipedia with less references than ours and yet they remain. Please let me know what level of references would satisfy you. I am truly confused... -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bogdano2 (talk • contribs)

No degree of references would satisfy at me present especially since the "our" above confirms my suspicion that you are promoting your own organisation. It is no use trying to convince me, I have made a pig-headed decision to oppose your article, period. But if you can convince the people who go to WP:DRV, I will accept their decision. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]