User talk:Bodhisato

August 2022

Hello, I'm SoyokoAnis. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ogyen Trinley Dorje without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SoyokoAnis - talk | PLEASE PING 20:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ogyen Trinley Dorje, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 21:36, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ogyen Trinley Dorje, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 21:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalise? I am trying to undo malicious action you are engaging on his page by claiming it has multiple issues. Then you state the issues is too much details. That's not intellectual honesty. Bodhisato (talk) 23:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk about News speak...double speak. The calm and collected vandal calling the one who put in the most correct information a vandal. SMFH Bodhisato (talk) 23:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ogyen Trinley Dorje shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 21:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bud. I am new here. But the problem is lots of good people looking not at the content only at the changes made. The smooth talking thieves get away with robbing the bank and the good Samaritan gets a kick in the butt. Bodhisato (talk) 23:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 18:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You guys are so sincere and intellectually honest that I am touched beyond expression. Bodhisato (talk) 03:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. --Kinu ^t/_c 21:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]