User talk:Bobizzle

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Utah Jazz, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Utah Jazz was changed by Bobizzle (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-03-28T03:04:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Enigma^msg 00:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Enigma^msg 22:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bobizzle! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 572 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tommy Manzella - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edge

It's still not yet determined if he's a face. We need to be patient and see if he's actually one. I mean, before the crowd cheered him on, though, some cheered. Sure, he acts different, but that's your point-of-view. I mean not that long ago a user added that Randy Orton had become a face, citing the way Orton acted at the start of his feud with Sheamus, and look, Orton's not a face, he's still a heel. Let's see how these few weeks play out, if Edge is indeed a face, it'll be noted in the article, you can be sure of that. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]