Jump to content

User talk:Boalco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Boalco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for businesses.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 17:16, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Section 50C of the Isle of Man Income Tax Act 1970. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

Hi there,

Although relatively well structured and of reasonably notable content, your article cites no references and/or citations to explain the points that you are trying to convey in the article. So I am afraid in its current form, I have to decline it. But it is a good subject matter and if you can improve the quality of the article, I am sure it will form a valuable information source at Wikipedia.

Please read some of the links below to improve the quality of your work


All the best

abhishek singh (talk) 22:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Section 50C of the Isle of Man Income Tax Act 1970. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(t|c) 11:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Section 50C of the Isle of Man Income Tax Act 1970, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

TucsonDavidU.S.A. 14:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Our account has been blocked. We are the leading authority on 50C QROPS in the isle of Man and our article has been accepted. We do need to make some adjustments to the links on the page and so request that our account is unblocked. The purpose of this account is not promotion and I admit we are struggling to put up a bland enough user page that is acceptable. As this is the case we will leave the user page blank. Please unblock this account so that we can correct a link. We have no interest in using evasion tac-tics to make the changes.

Thank you Boalco (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]