Jump to content

User talk:Bmusician/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Happy birthday!

Have a good one bud! Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 00:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you Aranea! --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 05:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
From me, too! I know we haven't met before, but saw your userpage and thought I'd give you a happy birthday greeting, especially since I like classical music and am from California, too. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the wish!!! --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 07:27, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

YOU NEED MORE BIRTHDAY WISHES! :) --Spidey665 01:23, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

I got many more from Facebook and from my colleagues ;) --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 03:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Bmusician. You have new messages at Spidey665's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Spidey665 13:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

I started a new Annoying Orange Wiki because I was globally blocked on Wikia. I am known as "Shea" on that wiki. The link is hidden in this message. --Shea McCormick 23:54, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

After I was globally blocked on Wikia by that jerk I tried to do the same thing, but Knife! and the others refused to move. not a good idea. They'll miss you, you were a great contributor to AOW. You shall focus on WP as it's a better place to be. Don't worry, I know how to cheer up. --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 01:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
The plan may succeed. Spidey665 20:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Trolling the trolls

A lesson that I have learned the hard way is that it's often better just to leave well enough alone rather then trying to talk sense into known idiots[1]. In this case I think it would have been best for you to simply stay on the moral high ground and ignore this individual. Long ago I would have done the exact same thing you did, but I have since taken a much more dispassionate approach to vandalism (and Wikipedia in general, for that matter). Instead of lowering yourself to his level, simply address the issue at hand; revert, revert, revert, report... problem solved until his next block expires. From experience, you WILL eventually reach the point that this kind of thing just stops affecting you. I don't even notice vandals getting getting upset with me anymore. When I start up Huggle, I just put on my confessor face and go to work. It's not personal to me, I don't give a damn if it's personal to them. Trusilver 03:34, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 03:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

RfA

Bryce, can I nominate you for adminship? And your edit notice says "Hello, !". Thanks. Spidey665 00:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

No, not yet. And thank you for telling me the flaw in my editnotice. --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 00:25, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I am Anti-anon

That is why I think registration should be required to edit. Spidey665 01:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Some wikis have persistent anons vandalizing that they start to require log-in to edit. Like the Super Mario Wiki. Of course, Wikipedia is big, and we get lots of vandals every day. But there are some anons who are doing productive things, so it wouldn't be intelligent to revoke anons to edit. Mostly annoying anons...but there are good anons. :) --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 01:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
And what the hell is "templating"? That's not a word. Spidey665 01:29, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Templating means using templates --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 01:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

typo fixing

Hello Bryce: I have noticed that you recently carried out "typo fixed Tv -> TV" in the Wikipedia "List of abbreviations in photography". Tv is not a typo. It is the correct abbreviation for Shutter priority aka Time value. Aperture value is similarly abbreviated to Av and ISO value to Sv. Please see the Wikipedia page on "Shutter speed" and books by authorities such as Langford: "Advanced Photography" (p. 311) Busch: "Digital SLR Cameras ..." (p. 98). Will you undo this edit please, or do you want me to do it? Best wishes, martinev (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

I have reverted my own edit – sorry about that. --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 10:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Intrepid Pictures

It is advised to wait 10 minutes before tagging a page G2, A1, or A3. It's supposed to avoid WP:BITE and all that. Thanks. →Στc. 02:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I understand now. --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 03:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


Reverted the edit of Mission BC

Hi B

saw you removed the addition of Richard Cummins as a person of note in Mission BC Canada. Apparently this current newspaper interview/article makes quite good evidence of my additions as accurate: http://www.bclocalnews.com/fraser_valley/missioncityrecord/entertainment/128035253.html

This also evidences his movie work: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1449616/

I reverted your edit and see no reason why Mission BC can't have one more person of 'reknown'.

Have a great day

Then why did you use such diabolical style while editing and not put the references in in the first place? --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 13:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry.

Sorry, made the page by mistake, was deleting it myself before you put it up for speedy deletion! :) (Tb0412 (talk) 23:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC))

Hello

Hello, Bmusician. You have new messages at 71.146.8.5's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PS: Just “out of curiousity”, does your username refer to the great San Francisco Giants pitching closer that has an epic beard and has thirty-eight saves in fourty-one save opportunities in the 2011 baseball season, or something else? By the way, the actual link to the thing/person I am referring to is here, if you didn't find it (it was in the “save opportunities part”) :) 71.146.8.5 (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

No, it refers to my real name, Bryce . :-) Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 12:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

How to edit.

Okay, I am sorry for causing vandalism as you claim it. But I am sincerely wanted to make a contribution . I wanted to edit the page RMLNLU, as it is the college I am currently studying in. This site. http://www.legallyindia.com/wiki/RMLNLU_Lucknow also talks about the same college and theerfor I just copied the entire page and pasted it on the wiki page and I was accused of vandalism. I have no clue how wiki works but please Incorporate these things on the RMLNLU page and remove the vandalism . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.237.34 (talk)

If you want to learn how to edit, please take a look at Help:Editing. And of course, if you want me to acknowledge your further messages, please sign your posts with ~~~~. Thanks. --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 14:00, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Bryce!

Hi! Oobi at Work (from Wikia) here. I just wanted to let you know I am here under this name: Oobiwazzup. -- Oobi  Wazzup  (Retired  Account)  01:13,11/10/2011 

Hiya!!! How's it going? --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 02:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Thanks

I appreciate the clean-up at my user talk. See ya 'round Tiderolls 06:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

No problem at all! It's part of my help to maintain Wikipedia's civil standards by doing such. Someday these dirty, annoying, petulant trolls will migrate out of the Internet... --Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 11:33, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Confirmation

--Bryce Contributions/Bmusician | talk 14:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

You are Awesome

Hello I,m AwesomeSponge I came from wikia because you retired on wikia and I just came here to visit you and YOU RULE!!!!:D-AwesomeSponge

Rappy4178

Hello, Bryce. I have replied to your message at User talk:Rappy4178. I hope my comments are helpful JamesBWatson (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Angela Kelly

Thanks for catching and correcting my move error. ... discospinster talk 02:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

No problem! --Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:48, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Tower Of Etruria

Just wanted to inform you that the page creator removed this page's CSD template which you placed. However significant work has been placed to the article in the meanwhile and I personally feel it should be kept. Feel free to re add the CSD template. Best, --Kangaroopowah 05:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I noticed that too, but, seeing that the page has been edited to make it no longer a G2, I did not re-add the tag. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 06:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

RFA thank you

Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

You're always welcome - you will be a great administrator. Congratulations! --Bryce (talk | contribs) 23:57, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

St Albans School (Hertfordshire)

The edits to the St Albans School (Hertfordshire) now includes almost 40 references, most of them from scholarly books. However, you chose to revert the page back to a very early form (with no references) as the new one had no "reliable citations" (in spite of it having 40!) Could you please undo your changes, as from my point of view they are nothing but vandalising new contributions to wikipedia.131.111.1.66 (talk) 11:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

No. And if you continue to label further reversions to your edits as "vandalism" there will be consequences. And I have nothing more to say about this, so drop it. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 12:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia's definition of vandalism includes (quoting from the Wikipedia:Vandalism page)

"Blanking, illegitimate Removing all or significant parts of a page's content without any reason, or replacing entire pages with nonsense. Sometimes referenced information or important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary." You have chosen not to "no valid reason" why a well-referenced page, with over 40 references to scholarly or published sources, should be reverted back to an earlier version which has 10+ mistakes in (for instance, the school is not a boarding school, as your edit says it is). Indeed, your behaviour is described well on the page; "referenced information or important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary". Looking at wikipedia's own rules, you are therefore vandalising this page, unless you can say, in detail, why the page has been edited incorrectly. I therefore await your full reasoning behind your edits.131.111.1.66 (talk) 15:04, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I am not the same user as 131.111.1.66- so don't put threats aimed at him on my talk page, thank you very much. They may be a nuisance sometimes but I agree with what they say here- their edit to the page is entirely legitimate and you really shouldn't have reverted it- and in doing so you're getting very close to breaking the three-revert rule, and if you break it I will warn another administrator of your wilful violations of wikipedia's rules. I have changed the page back; if you would like to discuss to any further it should be on the talk page of the article. Thanks, Brownandwhite (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
You aren't? I cannot believe that. You both mistake my reverts of "vandalism" which it is not. The reasons why your edits were reverted were explained many times to you. And I have nothing more to say on the matter, so drop it and please kindly stay off my talk page. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

RfA tranclusion

Hi. This is not being helpful at all. Perhaps what you should have done is to explain to the user why this cannot possibly succeed with only 15 (fifteen) edits, and point them to WP:Advice for RfA candidates. - perhaps you should read it yourself. Preventing this transclusion from going ahead will avoid any embarrassment and disappointment to this new user. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I apologize for that - and I've read that already. This mistake will not be repeated any further, and I will also apologize to the user himself. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. We all make mistakes; --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I should have known better. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Your talk page colour

Please consider changing the background color from this dark green so that comments can be read. It might be readable on your computer, but please remember that there are many different computers and browsers in use and they don't all render the way you may see it. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:23, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

 Done, December palette background changed to light green. I will consider checking all of the other month colors --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Fly from Here

Hi Bryce. I'm curious why you made this revert? The IP's edit looked like a good-faith change to me. 28bytes (talk) 04:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I thought the edit was changing the name completely; I didn't know All Music Guide was the previous name of Allmusic. Again, I apologize for the incident and have since reverted my own reversion. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 05:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
No worries! Thanks for the update. 28bytes (talk) 05:39, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Adminship/promotion

It's a perception thing. Adminship is meant to be no big deal, admins shoudln't have any authority over other users and are not more important than other editors. They do have a few extra tools, which allow them to do a few extra tasks, and there is a requirement that the editors have community trust before they are given the tools. Hence RfA. WormTT · (talk) 14:17, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I understand now --Bryce (talk | contribs) 23:05, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
No problems, feel free to hit me up if you've got any questions :) WormTT · (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

St Clement (hymn tune)

Hi. I noticed that you PRODded the above article only 24 minutes after it was created. It strikes me that a quick Google search (other search engines are available™) would have been enough to demonstrate that, although the article itself had not within those two dozen minutes established notability beyond one published book, there have been numerous newspaper articles about the tune and the hymn it accompanies.

Having said that, I only noticed the article because of the PROD so maybe it was worthwhile. Sadly, I've now forgotten which article I was planning to PROD when I saw it! Longwayround (talk) 12:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for establishing the article's notability and I think tagging the article for PROD so hastily was not a wise action on my part. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Maybe not wise, but fortuitous nonetheless! Longwayround (talk) 14:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Supporters of Real Madrid C.F.

I have deprodded the article. Although there are currently no sources, the subject appears notable due to its supporters rather uncommonly owning the club, its structural uniqueness, and notoriety of the Ultras Sur. Also note numerous Supporters of xxx football club pages exist, such as GA Supporters of FC Barcelona. Bobby (talk) 09:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

That article appears to be an uncredited machine translation of es:Real_Madrid_Club_de_Fútbol#Afici.C3.B3n Longwayround (talk) 11:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


we need your help

Join the ProElijahGroup Now because we want to fight the vandals and spammers and also because we have a small amount of members --AwesomeSponge (talk) 00:50, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

But how do I join? --Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:19, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

well you can join if you want to but first you need to sign up on the ProElijahGroupPedia to join --AwesomeSponge (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Now where's the ProElijahGroupPedia? --Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Here it is http://proelijahgroup.jumpwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page --AwesomeSponge (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Please

Can i copy your userpage and usertalk please --AwesomeSponge (talk) 19:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Why? I suppose it's okay as long as you do not claim you are a rollbacker when you're not and make some credible claim that the content was originally mine. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

make speedy deletion tags faster

I heard that there's a way to automatically tag and warn creators of speedy deletion articles. What is that tool called and how do I instal it? Cissy15 (talk) 06:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

There are actually a lot of tools to do so, although Twinkle is probably the fastest. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 06:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Ok thanks! Cissy15 (talk) 12:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya, Engineering college, VV Nagar, Anand

Hi, Just to let you know, I've changed (after some confusion on my part) your request for speedy deletion of Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya, Engineering college, VV Nagar, Anand from the importance criteria to the duplicate article criteria because it is a duplicate of Birla Vishwakarma Mahavidyalaya. Also, it wouldn't have been eligible for A7 deletion in the first place because it is an educational institution and because there was a claim of importance: "The first engineering college of Gujarat". --Mrmatiko (talk) 08:20, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for pinging me. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

But why?

I was editing on the North Korea page about Kim Jong-il!!!! What did I do wrong? YOURE NOT EVEN KOREAN!!!!!!!!

We have several policies here and your edits were against many of them, especially WP:NPOV and WP:OR. refrain from making them in the future. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 06:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

William Presser, newly submitted entry

Dear Bryce,

I am in the midst of submitting a new article about William Presser (surprised there isn't one yet), and am inexperienced at contributing articles.

I have submitted the article, which draws from an online bio at www.tritone-tenuto.com/presser.htm -- the bio was written by his daughter, and I am the proprietor of that website, and I've included the appropriate permission notice on that website.

However, I apparently have corrupted the wikipedia submission while trying to add a notice about this.

I'm hoping you can guide me through the process of restoring the original submission, and documenting permission to derive this article from the tritone-tenuto source.

Thank you!

Hi! Due to legal reasons, we cannot use copyrighted material from external sites without permission. If you hold the copyright to the material, send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation to release your content under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL. However, you could reconsider rewriting the content in your own words. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

86.40.204.198

I am the source of the mess with user talk:86.40.204.198. I inadvertently reverted his edit, he reverted my reversion before I did and someone else undid that. I have sent an apology to 86.40.204.198. Sorry for the disruption. Jim1138 (talk) 02:02, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Mistakes are made, but then this user accused Cissy15 for what vandalism is not. I do not think you did anything wrong here. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Can you please help??? This user keeps saying I'm vandalizing! Cissy15 (talk) 02:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Well, I should not have reverted. I can understand 86.40.204.198's anger. Jim1138 (talk) 02:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
That is true. I'm pretty sure the IP abusing warning templates has ceased. It's best now to let him keep editing the page he tried to edit, and to move on from this. Best, Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Toccata (Schumann), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chord (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks DPL bot. Changed to Chord (music). --Bryce (talk | contribs) 11:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

24.125.171.194

user talk:24.125.171.194 either known an amazing amount of stuff or he is just making it up. Check out his contributions 24.125.171.194 What do you think? Jim1138 (talk) 23:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

While some edits of this IP are okay, I guess, many of them are vandalism or editing tests. I'll go ahead and revert what I believe to not be constructive. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 23:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
He is now reported to AIV. Again, thanks for keeping me in the loop. Cheers, Bryce (talk | contribs) 23:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! Jim1138 (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
You're welcome! You know how much I hate IP's who just don't get off Wikipedia even after being blocked for long periods of time? --Bryce (talk | contribs) 23:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Googalyweed1 & Gillweed1995 ‎

Are they the same person? I was thinking that User:Gillweed1995 was vandalizing User:Googalyweed1's user page. Jim1138 (talk) 00:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Hmm...haven't a clue...but since Googalyweed is now at AIV's report list, the only way to tell if they are the same is if Gillweed is stopped by the autoblock of Googalyweed. Their usernames are quite similar. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Googalyweed1 signed a post as Gillweed1995 on User talk:Katarighe. I let Katarighe know this. Jim1138 (talk) 01:04, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Either intentional or impersonation. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Iris on Rainy Days

Hello Bmusician. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Iris on Rainy Days to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. →Στc. 00:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for doing so. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

A tool for you!

Hi Bmusician! I've just come across one of your edits (or that you have been patrolling new pages), and noticed that you might appreciate some help with references.

I case you're not aware, you might consider using this tool – it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script: 

// Add [[WP:Reflinks]] launcher in the toolbox on left
addOnloadHook(function () {
 addPortletLink(
  "p-tb",     // toolbox portlet
  "http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py/" + wgPageName 
   + "?client=script&citeweb=on&overwrite=&limit=30&lang=" + wgContentLanguage,
  "Reflinks"  // link label
)});

onto Special:MyPage/skin.js, then paste the bare URL between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for PDF documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. You may consider taking on Category:Articles needing link rot cleanup. So long! --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 03:05, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've installed it! --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Chess

Hey thar, hope you had a very merry one! What's your chess rating? Do you reckon you'd fancy a game on here? We could just type in PGN notation or somesuch. I've been doing a lot of it recently. Hope your new year's a happy one! ;) Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 03:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Chess is something I do for fun, so I don't basically have a rating ;) You can play my chess game at User:Bmusician/chess. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:13, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm, sounds like you'd enjoy Chess.com. Free live games. It's good fun. Here's me: [2]. Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 03:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Btw you've been doing some great vandal arse-kicking recently. ;) Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 03:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Wow thanks! I'll consider registering for Chess.com sooner than later ;) and thanks for the recognition! --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:22, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
No problem mate. :) Aranea Mortem (talk to me) 03:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Bmusician, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Bmusician/Sandbox.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.
  • If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi DASHBot. Just so you know, that was intentional and was a test to see how long it took you to resopnd. If you'd like to, shall we play again? --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sailing Soul(s)

Hello Bmusician. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sailing Soul(s), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to albums. Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 03:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I know that and removed it myself before receiving your message. When I tagged it, there was no content on the page that said it was an album. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 03:24, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Help with vandal

Hi. A couple of users have vandalized by User and talk pages, blanking and moving someone else's there. Can you help? I think the culprits are Wayne2011 and Special:Contributions/203.82.95.93, who blanked my page. Dan56 (talk) 05:44, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I've reported him to AIV, obviously he's only here for vandalism. I'll try to help you move the pages back. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 05:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Comment

Good morning. I understand that this user may be annoying you, but for an editor who requests others to "stay within the bounds of civility" on his talk page, I must say that this edit summary and this message probably don't fall within those bounds. This isn't the only article the IP has been causing issues with, but I would ask you please to refrain from telling any editor, regardless of their status, to "shut up", or intimating that a block or ban would be "the grand prize", as sarcasm serves only to inflame delicate situations. If you have any questions, you can feel free to ask me at my talk page, or you can respond here and leave {{talkback}} on my page. Thanks, and have a good New Year's Eve. — KV5 • Talk • 13:18, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

I've seen many editors in the past behaving similarly; I will no longer be among them. Thank you for your reminder. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:02, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Bhaag Milkha Bhaag

Hello. Aren't 6 users supposed to be enough for getting a consensus of a discussion? There was a strong appeal for WP:NFF as well. If not, could you please tell me what to do when a debate is relisted? Thanks and regards. X.One SOS 14:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

How many users who voted is not relevant. In my opinion, the consensus was not clear enough, so I relisted it to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus could be reached by more editors. Please read WP:RELIST for instructions. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Kalpiz

Not without some more warnings! (I've also unprotected your talk page, user talk pages should never be semiprotected except in extreme cases, and even then only for short periods) Prodego talk 08:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

See WP:UPROT. If you disagree with this policy propose it be changed. If you disagree with my actions, take it to ANI. Prodego talk 08:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
I won't be taking it to ANI, but "Users whose talk page is semi-protected for lengthy or indefinite periods of time should have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page to allow good faith comments from non-autoconfirmed users." which I do. If you unprotect my talk page, you should be unprotecting other indefinitely protected user talks as well. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

I do when I see them. Your talk page has been protected all of zero times before being indef protected. That hardly demonstrates a persistent problem. Compare to NawlinWiki's talk page, or even my own talk page. User talk pages should simply not be protected, there is a good change, especially for those involved in anti-vandalism work, that an IP or non-autoconfirmed editor will need to contact you. Prodego talk 08:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

All of zero times??? --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Ah yes, sorry. One time. Prodego talk 08:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


Underhill Society of America

Hello, I want to thank you for getting involved with the Underhill Society of America and William Underhill pages. Both have been substantially improved from their original versions with new sources added, and text revisions made to generate notability. Being somewhat new to Wikipedia, I just wanted to ask why these articles were renominated for AFD, when all of the recommendations said "Keep"? Thank you for your clarification, and any further help and assistance you are able to provide in advance. IDKremer (talk) 19:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Consensus is for Keep on the William Underhill page. Are you able to do a speedy keep? IDKremer (talk) 22:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, they're really helpful. I've closed "William Underhill" as speedy keep, consensus is clearly to keep. I don't know about "Underhill Society of America" however. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 13:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your help on WWU. With respect to the AFD for the Underhill Society of America, the AFD talk page has consensus for Keep. With this as with others, I anticipate it is only a matter of time until the AFD discussion is closed. Substantial improvements and many sources have been added since the first AFD request was made. I would, of course, be open to any further suggestions that you and others have of how to further improve this page. Thanks again and look forward to continuing to work with you on this important topic. IDKremer (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Joe Bowker

Trying to create an entry for boxing champion Joe Bowker. Saw that you responded. I am confused about the next step. Any help will be appreciated. Battingfourth (talk) 17:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission was identified as "blank" because you forgot to close the <!-- with -->. No worries, I've closed it for you. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 14:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

OPIS Network submission

Hello Bryce,

You have concerns that I am attempting to advertise, but that is not my intention. Since I work with government agencies I am sharing some of the challenges that they are experiencing. If you want me to delete some of that I can, but one of the reviewers asked for more substance and information on why this entry is a valuable one.

NormAlohanorm (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Good Humor

The Barnstar of Good Humor
I am not sure if that was your intention, but your editsummary is pretty funny in this context. No worries, I fixed your mistake again. Von Restorff (talk) 18:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Mini Band

You're right, I should have deleted it as unreferenced promotional content, which is a CSD criterion. Do you want me to recreate and delete with the correct tag, or leave as is? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I think either way's fine. As long as you've known and acknowledged the little mistake, it would be good enough :-) --Bryce (talk | contribs) 13:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for patrolling my patrols! :) I agree with removing those tags but I have re tagged them, not for speedy deletion but for normal deletion on the grounds that they are unsourced biographies. I also believe these people are unnotable but that may be changed once references appear. Thank you and let me know if anything else comes up.Zzaffuto118 (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Zz, we're glad to have you at new page patrol :) New page patrol is something that should never be rushed through. In order to avoid WP:BITE which scares off new users away from Wikipedia, please wait ten minutes before tagging A1 (no context) or A3 (no content). Of course, G10 (attack pages), G3 (vandalism/hoaxes), and G12 (copyright violations) should be tagged immediately. You've been tagging A7 on new pages which it doesn't apply to - any article that makes a credible claim of its importance, even if unsourced, does not fall under A7 (but could fall under other criteria). Thanks for being interested in patrolling, we hope you will continue. Don't forget to read Wikipedia:New pages patrol and WP:CSD. Best of luck, Bryce (talk | contribs) 12:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bmusician/Archive_2&oldid=1141714025"