User talk:Bmdsherman

Copyright issue with WRKI

Hello. Concerning your contribution, WRKI, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.i95rock.com/behind/programming.php. As a copyright violation, WRKI appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. WRKI has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:WRKI and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:WRKI with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:WRKI.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrongly blocked from: Steel359 so could sombody please help me??? I belive Steel359 should lose his/her privlages right now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bmdsherman (talk • contribs) 01:15, 27 February 2007.

It looks like a good faith block to me. You made two contributions: one was to add a link to the WRKI article in the Interstate 95 article, and the other was the dump from the I95 website—which, as noted above, is a massive copyright violation. It might be a little harsh for a first offence, true, but I don't think it's unjustified. —C.Fred (talk) 02:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

C.fred-

C.fred- it was a little harsh I right now should be contrubting I logged on saw A LOT of other staions with all their info posted I KNEW it woudn't hurt to post W--I and it didn't so I need sombody to go and sumit somthing saying I deserve my editing rights back.

PS. Does anybody know how long until I can edit again?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bmdsherman (talk • contribs).

Policy is that the blocking admin is the first person to get involved on an unblocking situation. If you look at WP:BLOCK, it will talk about other layers of recourse you have.

I've also posted the following message on User Talk:Steel359: Greetings! Not sure if you're monitoring his talk page, but User:Bmdsherman is wondering what he needs to do to get unblocked. I didn't see a tag on his Talk page for the reason for the block, though I did see the block log. (Personally, I don't quite blame any admin for blocking a user whose two contributions are a copyvio article creation and a disambiguation-type link toward the page.) Since practice is to start everything with the admin who made the block, I just wanted to relay the message on his behalf, to make sure this doesn't go unaddressed. Regards,

—C.Fred (talk) 03:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's actually this page as well, which was similar to WRKI. Incidentally, I was more concerned about its spammyness than copyvioness. At any rate, I'll unblock you assuming you're not going to create articles like that again. – Steel 14:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why you shoulg unblock me

There where two reasons for the block,

1. link to the wrki home page

2. the creation of a site with copyright matrial from wrki

Let me explayne why this is wrong:

Reason 1: is wrong because creating a link is not a coppyright violation. (go to the wrki home page and you will see that they have links to other sites)

Reason 2: I wanted to see a site about wrki so I searched for it here. I did not find a site for wrki however I saw a site for almost every other raido staion. I also got a message from wikipedia saying I should create a page for wrki.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bmdsherman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(No reason provided by blocked user, but see above.)

Decline reason:

See the above comments by C.fred et al. You still fail to understand that Wikipedia is not for advertising and does not allow copyrighted material. — Sandstein 20:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.