User talk:Bluedude588

This is Bluedude588's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Your contributions to technology articles are particularly fine. MisterFixerUpper (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bluedude588! You created a thread called Question about notability and sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Hey, i hope you don't mind [ https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Civic_Center%2C_Denver&type=revision&diff=930205820&oldid=930166906 my reverting] a bunch of your recent edits at Civic Center, Denver and also similarly at Golden Triangle, Denver. I think it is usually too confusing, during an AFD, for editors to move articles or rename articles or make major changes of the nature of articles. In this case it looks like earlier that another editor was bothered, and just now I was a bit bothered, to see some of this.

Your opening the AFD has had a good effect, towards bringing up need for a proper article about the real civic center to be created (or re-created). Thanks, --Doncram (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I do mind. I spent a lot of time making that article better. If you want to undo portions of it, that'd be one thing. But undoing all of it is honestly frustrating. The editor who was bothered didn't know what they were talking about IMO and I'm curious as to what bothered you. I don't believe I changed anything that could not be easily independently verified. Bluedude588 (talk) 06:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think that all or mostly got worked out okay, as discussed at Talk:Civic Center, Denver (neighborhood), where I have posted more, recently. Including that Golden Triangle is acknowledged as a real thing, and can be properly described, though not used as an article title. I am working on Draft:Civic Center Historic District (Denver, Colorado) now, finding it to be quite complex.

I came to your page hoping to send an email to you about something, but your "send me an email" option is turned off. If you send me an email using that option on my page, i would email you back. NP if you don't choose to. Your page says you are a student of history, hope that's going well. --cheers, --Doncram (talk) 00:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tay Anderson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tay Anderson, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Anderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice: gender-related controversies

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

For purely informational purposes. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]