User talk:Blue Weta

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dustin O'Halloran, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Outlander^07@talk 11:57, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dustin didn't remix his song Opus 23. He only allowed for the song to be used in the podcast. Blue Weta (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Weta, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Blue Weta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue Weta! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edits reverted, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shida Shahabi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shida Shahabi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't see the button "Submit your draft for review!" Can you help? Blue Weta (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello Blue Weta. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Blue Weta. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Blue Weta|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shida Shahabi

Hello, Blue Weta. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shida Shahabi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shida Shahabi

Hello, Blue Weta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shida Shahabi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]