User talk:Blue 42 Strike
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en
wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).
Blue 42 Strike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As far as I am aware, although I am using multiple accounts, I did not actually "abuse" them. I created this one first, then Shooter MacPherson (only now realising I accidentally used that one when I thought I was continuing a conversation at Elizabeth Fowler), but the mistake would have been obvious to anyone who looked. I then created Packing the pocket to make a request of Guy Macon, and since that issue is unrelated to Elizabeth Fowler, that isn't improper. These connections seem to have only been discovered because I objected to Favonian ujustifiably blocking Packing the pocket, that issue being dealt with as UTRS55472, but I would rather deal with everything here, because I feel like I am being gaslighted in that process. I will repeat here what I said there about Favonian's obviously ujustified act of preventing me from editing the Packing the pocket talk page to object to his false accusation I am a "troll": that is in direct contradiction to "editing of the user's talk page should be disabled only in cases of continued abuse of their user talk page, or when the user has engaged on serious threats, accusations or outing which needs to be prevented from reoccurring". Blue 42 Strike (talk) 21:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
@Blue 42 Strike: Have you used any other (blocked) accounts besides the two you mentioned at UTRS? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'll note that Blue 42 Strike didn't admit to the other two accounts. We found them during the investigation into the unblock request. Still, now's the time for Blue 42 Strike to admit to any other accounts, if they have any. Lying now would be a terrible plan. --Yamla (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
You can note that false version of events. In reality, I had simply not yet answered his question at UTRS, I was more concerned with him repeating Favonian's false accusation and ignoring Favonian's misconduct. He still hasn't explained either issue. And I certainly wasn't aware any "investigation" was under way that had apparently put a ticking clock on it. The first I was aware of it, was when you blocked them, and you can see above where I freely explained myself at the earliest opportunity, ignored by you, and had immediately looped you both in at UTRS, now mischaracterised by Deepfriedokra. So no, you really don't get to accuse me of wrongdoing without those important caveats being understood by everyone. As to his follow up question, I believe the answer is no. Recently anyway. I think I dabbled years ago. Something similar to the Fowler case. Blue 42 Strike (talk) 23:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- This is not factually accurate. We identified other accounts, too, including globally-locked accounts. --Yamla (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
I think you must be mistaken then. Blue 42 Strike (talk) 00:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Blue 42 Strike (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have not abused multiple accounts. I have operated multiple accounts, this one, Shooter MacPherson and Packing the pocket (all explained above, at the earliest opportunity), and possibly others long ago, in a way I do not believe was wrong. Neither Deepfriedokra, Yamla or Jpgordon have even acknowledged this explanation, if it is deemed faulty. I have no knowledge of any other accounts claimed to have been connected to me, and I am not seeing any other accounts listed in "Wikipedia sockpuppets of Blue 42 Strike" that I could either explain if I have simply forgotten them, or explicitly deny if I do not recognise them.
Further information if required (not intened as part of the appeal):
I am trying to be fair and reasonable and approach this matter with an open mind, but I feel I am being seriously provoked by Favonian, Deepfriedokra, Yamla and now Jpgordon. All of whose actions could themselves be said to be trolling (widely acknowledged outside of Wikipedia at least as being a bad faith interaction designed to simply elicit a response for personal gratification, more easily identified when it becomes clear the contents of the target's response is immaterial and indeed duly ignored). If I have been convicted of abusing Wikipedia as the result of a secret investigation without the opportunity to defend myself, which is my interpretation of the limited information given above and at UTRS, I would appreciate that being made clear, so I can take the next steps with a clear conscience. I have already been falsely accused of trolling by Favonian, who also flagrantly acted improperly by removing my ability to edit my own talk page when he blocked Packing the pocket for this one alleged act of trolling (proven above with explicit quotation of the relevant protocol). And I was then gaslighted by Deepfriedokra, who simply blindly repeated the false accusation of trolling as if it doesn't even need explaining, and who seems to believe there can be no justification in anyone requesting Guy Macon be clear about his own use of Wikipedia accounts. These things are frankly absurd abuses of a seemingly unlimited sense of power. Nobody involved in my appeals has even acknowledged any of those things yet, which all suggests I am right, despite their serious nature, so I do not think it is unreasonable to think these further allegations of my alleged "verified abuse" could be mistakes, or worse, based on an original (and deeply unfair) presumption of trolling deduced from a single post. I am entitled to fair and indeed honest treatment at the hands of the volunteer Administrators of Wikipedia. Blue 42 Strike (talk) 10:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Globally banned editor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.