User talk:Bloovee

Welcome!

Hello, Bloovee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Oldelpaso 11:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Omega Development Site

A tag has been placed on Omega Development Site, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 17:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as in Talk:Omega Development Site, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 18:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Article

If you can create the article with 1.) reliable third party sources that assert its significance (references to other wikipedia pages and pages for the company that supports it do not generally count as reliable source. You can practice on your user page if you like and when it is done, ask me if it is ready for article creation. As of the tiem your article was created, in its current state it was not an appropraite wikipedia article. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 18:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you hadn't been so quick to delete it, I could have added a link to the French government site http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/inventai/itiinv/archixx/pann/p39.htm

It doesn't look like a case of blatant advertising to me, and bearing in mind that the tag requesting deletion was added only two minutes after the article was created the deletion does seem harsh. I've undeleted it and moved to your "userspace" at User:Bloovee/Hotel Belvédère du Rayon Vert‎ to enable you to add the links. If you need any help with reference formatting, just ask. After that I'll move it back to its original location. Oldelpaso (talk) 12:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Knew I could trust a City fan!

Ah yes, I forgot to check up on that. I've made an edit to "wikify" the article so it fits with the house style, and have returned it to the mainspace. A quick tip, when leaving a message on a talk page you can sign and date your post by using four tildes (~~~~). Oldelpaso (talk) 20:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like this? Bloovee (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)bloovee[reply]

Crewe

I have just reverted your edit to Crewe (UK Parliament constituency). Per WP:MOS#First_sentences, the bolded title words at the start of the first sentence of an article should not be linked. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warrington notable people

It wasn't me. Check the record. • Freechild'sup? 10:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parish Church

Thank you for adding to Parish church. I have reverted your changes as there is no source given for them, and wikipedia does require that statements can be verified. I realise that there might not be anything on the web (or elsewhere) that addresses this particular point, but you might be able to prove it by exception (maybe a parish website that explains that its centre of worship is not a parish church, or that some neighbouring area is not just not in that parish but not in any parish).

Incidentally, there is a separate article for Church of England parish church. If your additions can be sourced, they might fit well in that article too.

Thanks Grblundell (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Your point is fair, and if I have a defence, it is that the previous text had been there for some time, so no one had previously had a problem with it. This is not a good defence, but to take the extreme opposite view (that something is not sourced so it can be replaced by anything else that is not sourced) could lead to rubbish being replaced with rubbish. I know this is not what you are doing, but there are people out there who will do just that!

I appreciate the reference that you have now added, and I have added a reference list so that it shows up at the bottom of the article. Is it perhaps worth expanding the reference - I, for one, would not know where to find the text of a pastoral measure, and I'm somone who has been an active member of the CofE throughout my life! Wikipedia:Citing_sources#How_to_cite_sources appears to explain the ideal that we should head for, but I haven't actually read this section so I may be giving you a steer to the wrong place.

Many thanks for helping to improve these articles. Grblundell (talk) 08:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:100 1233b.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:100 1233b.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:100 1233b.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JaGa^talk 18:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Trinity Church, Warrington

I have reverted some of the material you added to this article. It was added to sentences which were referenced, but the references did not contain the material you added, which made them invalid. All information in Wikipedia has to be verified by published reliable sources - see Wikipedia:Verifiability. And although personal observations are not untrue, they are not appropriate in an encyclopedia - see Wikipedia:No original research, in particular Citing oneself. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least leave the change from del Santo to del Sarto because that's obviously correct. I know more of the history of the church than what's on the church's website, but if it helps, I'll get the history section of the website changed.

Bloovee (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Friends of the Cromford Canal

A tag has been placed on Friends of the Cromford Canal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 12:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are many similar entries - http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_waterway_societies_in_the_United_Kingdom Bloovee (talk) 10:09, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Regarding this edit [1] please note that per WP:STATUSQUO:

If you make a change which is good-faith reverted, do not simply reinstate your edit - leave the status quo up. If there is a dispute, the status quo reigns until a consensus is established to make a change.

So you should leave the text as is, then see if you get consensus for your changes, now that I have objected twice. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manchester City F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fernandinho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fiddlers Ferry power station may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

].<ref name="powerprogramme" /> All its coal is imported, largely by train from [[Liverpool]] docks) or other ports. 16,000 tonnes of coal are burned each day.<ref name=powerprogramme /> It also

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Church of England parish church may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

will usually license another building and may designate it as a [[Parish Centre of Worship]].<ref>{{url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/2011/3/section/43 |title= Mission and Pastoral Measure 2011,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glulam - history section - churches

Hi,

I'm an expert and published author on the subject of glulam, including its history. May I please ask you to add one or more citations to your changes of 14 February 2014? Please try to ensure that there is some way that the church roofs you mention are glued laminated, not mechanically laminated, an older method, quite common in such roofs. At the same time, you might sort out the syntax so that this section reads correctly. Unless you do these jobs within a reasonable time, I may revert your alterations. Thanks.--Dendrotek 12:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]