User talk:Bloodyducklips

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bloodyducklips. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Joshua ^{Talk to me} _{What I've done?} 13:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sinophobia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 11:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Sinophobia, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for unexplained seemingly POV removal of content. Thomas.W ^talk 12:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Anti-Vietnamese sentiment, you may be blocked from editing. Warning for POV edits (the lede/lead of the article should only reflect sourced content in the article, not introduce new and unsourced claims, as your new lede/lead does, other changes in the text are also non-neutral). Thomas.W ^talk 13:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Philg88 ^♦talk 07:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Once the above block has expired, please do not make any further moves without discussion on the appropriate talk page. Moving main space articles to the Wikipedia name space is almost never necessary and applying your own POV to article titles without consensus is a breach of our policies and guidelines. Thanks, Philg88 ^♦talk 07:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shandong people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shandong people

Regarding Shandong people, you've reverted my deletion of the orphan tag - it was not an orphan, as it was linked to Shandong; please correct this. Also, you've reinstated a January 2013 merge template without justifying this action in either your edit or on the talk page. Please justify why you think that this stale merge proposal should be re-opened. Klbrain (talk) 08:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're reversed an edit of mine on Shandong people, restoring a stale merge proposal template from January 2013 without making a case for a merge. Do you think a merge is worthwhile? If so, why?

Also, you restored the orphan template. Following my edits it was no longer an orphan. Please consider fixing this. Klbrain (talk) 11:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the interim, I've reversed the relevant edit. Klbrain (talk) 05:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chen Rong. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

History of the United States

I reverted your edit because it is known in English as the American Revolution rather than Revolutionary America. Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User:Kanguole. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Zanhe (talk) 04:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for harassing other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Closedmouth (talk) 05:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bloodyducklips. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]