User talk:Bloodofruler

Welcome

Hello, Bloodofruler, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

August 2020

Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kshatriya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rook6. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ratnasimha but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Rook6 (talk) 10:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Singh, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop making changes to Wikipedia articles without providing citations to reliable sources for verification. I have just reverted an edit you made which changed some content away from what the cited source says. If this continues, you are likely to be blocked from editing. So please pay attention to this warning, and to the others you have received on this talk page. The warning messages provide links for you to follow, but I want to emphasise these two which you must understand if you wish to continue editing here - WP:V explains the requirement for verifiability, and WP:RS explains what Wikipedia means by reliable sources. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ahir; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RegentsPark (comment) 15:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chariotrider555. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jadeja without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.Chariotrider555 (talk) 22:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Abhira tribe, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop making changes to Wikipedia articles without providing citations to reliable sources for verification. I have just reverted an edit you made which changed some content away from what the cited source says. If this continues, you are likely to be blocked from editing. So please pay attention to this warning, and to the others you have received on this talk page. The warning messages provide links for you to follow, but I want to emphasise these two which you must understand if you wish to continue editing here - WP:V explains the requirement for verifiability, and WP:RS explains what Wikipedia means by reliable sources.--HinduKshatrana (talk) 05:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lalotra. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not edit at Lalotra. Bloodofruler (talk) 14:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, I meant Jadeja.Stop blanking content like you did at Jadeja.Chariotrider555 (talk) 14:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ahir without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See this edit.[1] Heba Aisha (talk) 19:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have specified the edit you made was blatant vandalism.See the link above.Heba Aisha (talk) 19:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok mam sorry for that but i have a question I added origin of Abhira with link on Abhira Tribe ,I don't know why they removed that. Bloodofruler (talk) 19:37, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhira tribe Bloodofruler (talk) 19:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where, can you share diff.?Heba Aisha (talk) 19:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling mistake Abhira tribe Bloodofruler (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may post ur query [2] here. The other editor has invited you and others who are making changes in that article.Djm-leighpark can tell u the real reason behind revert.! Heba Aisha (talk) 19:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Shashanka, you may be blocked from editing. utcursch | talk 19:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Jadeja. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Jadeja, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Abhira tribe. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bloodofruler reported by User:Heba Aisha (Result: ). Thank you. Heba Aisha (talk) 04:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me, when i added origin of Abhira tribe A group of ahirs always removed that i don't know why, same group change Jadeja history because ahir hates jadeja. Bloodofruler (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also give source of origin Still they removed that Bloodofruler (talk) 14:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 05:07, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bloodofruler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Some editers added content without source i want to remove that. I want to make wikipedia factfull contect site.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 12:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bloodofruler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am blocked for dispute editing and edit warring I won't do it again. Bloodofruler (talk) 14:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Those aren't the only reasons you were blocked, you are also blocked for things like personal attacks and vulgar edit summaries like this that are inappropriate for civil discourse. This request does not describe how you will act differently in the future, so I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.