User talk:Blongnos

Blongnos, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Blongnos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for you agreed on your other account to NOT write about an organization you were involved with. You have continued to promote that entity on Wikipedia, contrary to your promise.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. the panda ₯’ 00:07, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not change anything, I only removed info that could be considered as promotion. I also asked you to delete the other wikipedia account that is related to the company, but you won't do that. So where is the issue?

As the founder of Wikipedia has stated, "those with COI should never edit the article, but may propose sourced changes on the article talkpage to obtain consensus". As you know, we cannot delete accounts, but just because you changed accounts, it does not allow you to continue to edit on behalf of the company the panda ₯’ 19:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK I understand. I will let others edit from now on. Thank you. Am I able to delete my account myself?

Again, accounts cannot be deleted by anyone ... if you don't want to edit, just logout and forget it. Remember, however, if you ever decide you wish to edit, you must have the block removed one way or another - the block applies to you, the person. the panda ₯’ 21:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can I have the block lifted?

As per the instructions above, and as per WP:GAB, you need to understand the reason(s) behind the block, and convince me (or a patrolling admin if you submit an unblock request) that the reason(s) that led to the block will not be repeated the panda ₯’ 19:22, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blongnos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reasons, that Wikipedia is a resource for the public and shall not be a place for advertising, which was not what I intended, ... and as such, I will not be editing nor writing anything about that company and at all, as my interests may be linked to it. So you can rest assured that it will never happen again

Decline reason:

Unblocked on the understanding that you will no longer edit the page Reel One Entertainment or other articles related to the subject. You may use the taklpages of these articles for discussion if you wish. Directly editing such articles will result in reblocking without warning. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.