User talk:Blockader

This user may have left Wikipedia. Blockader has not edited Wikipedia since February 3, 2018. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Blockader, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Brian 17:18, 24 June 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

POV tag in Anarcho-capitalism

If you're going to put a tag like that on an article, it is your responsibility to start the discussion on the talk page by stating what you think is wrong with the article, and perhaps starting to edit the article to fix what you think is wrong with it. Otherwise, you're just a vandal. Argyriou 19:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

I think you might be in breach with the WP:3RR rule, I reverted your change, and will not report you. Intangible 18:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 3RR rule is for a 24 hour period, not per day. Intangible 19:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FAR of anarcho-capitalism

Hi, there. You may want to take a peek at the FAR of anarcho-capitalism, as they are closing the vote. --AaronS 18:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:That'sHot and 3RR

Eh, I don't like using the policies just to break somebody's balls. That's gaming the system. Although, I think that it's pretty clear that he's logging out in order to avoid breaking WP:3RR. --AaronS 15:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

There are about 10 or more source said ancap is form of individualist anarchism, so please look at those source and stop hiding it. BTW, I won't login so you can see where my ip come from, and that is ONLY way i use for editing, so you can't accuse me for being someone's sock, got it?203.84.71.118 16:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, cool off. I agree with you and that crap got to me when I first got here (I even vandalized RJII's page to say "Fuck you" once). It won't help, I've tried. Just act as if you're nice. And if you want to vent, do it over email with friends. And I don't think you're a sock, you and aaron have different writing styles. And the reason you would be his sock, other than him being yours, is that aaron has been here longer, therefore he would be the sock master. Anyway, I know where you're coming from, but just grin and bear it in public. Ungovernable Force^{The Wiki Kitchen!} 17:32, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Class Conflict

Hi, I've nominated the Class conflict article for Wikipedia:Article Creation and Improvement Drive, feel like supporting it? Donnacha 15:50, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doh! Good point :) Ya Basta!

Anarchism

From the policy on editing protected pages:

"Reverting to an old version of the page from a week or so before the controversy started if there is a clear point before the controversy."

So if there is a clear consensus that the page should be reverted, I'll do it. But I need a showing of concensus. A poll would be the best way to do this. Given how contentious that article is, I'm hesistant to do anything like that without a consensus. --Woohookitty^(meow) 17:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism

In case you haven't seen it, the AnCaps are trying to delete the Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism article [1]. Donnacha 23:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[2] made on October 5 2006 to Anarchism

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 3 hours. William M. Connolley 19:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was certianly in violation of 3RR, as was the person who reported me. we were in the process of discussing on the talk page the changes that certian individuals were trying to make and on the talk page of one of the concerned users (ancap). i was reverting the change some users were attempting to add to a citation which is a highly suspect thing to do. we came to a compromise and the issue is solved as far as i know. Blockader 21:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wolf in our midst

[3] Nuff said. Ungovernable Force^{Got something to say?} 16:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for the new person, I wouldn't be surprised. If you can't tell, I'm not editing much anymore, but I am still watching over things a bit. I saw that user a couple days ago and my eyebrows definitely raised. Mind you, this was after only 2 or 3 minutes of looking into them. I would not be surprised. Ungovernable Force^{Got something to say?} 04:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anarcho-capitalism

I've lodged a complaint against him on the administrator's noticeboard that basically recounts his flagrant policy violations at the anarcho-capitalism article. If you would like to post a comment about his behaviour in other articles, I encourage you to do so. -- WGee 06:40, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

If you've taken a break, please pop back to the talk page, I don't wanna be left on my own! Donnacha 22:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Thanks for the back-up, you might want to have a look at this. Donnacha 19:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Communism, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

The Revolution...

Nah, not me, that was some Trot who stole my name ;) Most of my work is online, so a google for Donnacha DeLong will give you an idea. As for my getting out of here, honestly, I was wasting far too much time in pointless arguments and I've got a new job and have better things to do with my life! Donnacha logged out - two fingers to the stalkers! 00:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Communism.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 04:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC).

Wikimania in Atlanta!

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 08:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:User categories for discussion on -isms

Hi. A user category that you are in has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. You are welcome to comment. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reverted

Your user page was recently subjected to what I believe was vandalism. Please view the page history and view it yourself to determine whether the edit was in fact an attack against you. Regards, CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion discussion

You participated in a previous discussion on the deletion of Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism. You may be interested that a new deletion review has begun at WP:Articles_for_deletion/Anarchism_and_anarcho-capitalism_(2nd_nomination). Tb (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sign Blockader (talk) 03:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Blockader. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Redtick english coonhound.jpg

The file File:Redtick english coonhound.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]