User talk:Blissfulust

Welcome

Hello, Blissfulust, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 21:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: 100 Little Deaths (June 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:100 Little Deaths and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:100 Little Deaths, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blissfulust! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:00, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @KylieTastic: Thank you for your invitation and welcome note. I have randomly submitted a few drafts for submission! Shall I take them back? Is it possible? Can you review them?

Thank you :)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saron Gebresellassi (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced material should be removed. Unclear whether there has been significant coverage in independent sources, outside of routine election coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saron Gebresellassi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saron Gebresellassi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 07:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Teahouse, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. We don't just delete questions which have been answered. They stay for the benefit of other users, & will be archived & deleted in due course. David Biddulph (talk) 15:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@David Biddulph: I posted it again as a revised question to receive more attention.

Please declare any connection with blocked user, TheNavedKhan.

Further to our ongoing discussion here at the Teahouse, please would you state whether you are operating this account, after being blocked as User:TheNavedKhan.

I find it most unusual that TheNavedKhan created and worked on the page Draft:Saron Gebresellassi until 10:20 UTC on 23rd June they were blocked from editing (which they still are).

Less than 24 hours later, at 14 June 2020 at 09:39 UTC, you registered this new account. And on your 9th edit (or 13th if you include 4 since-deleted edits) you submitted that Draft article for AFC review, and have been pursuing it at The Teahouse quite doggedly ever since. You might wish to be made aware that we take block evasion very seriously, and have the ability to get technical experts called CHECKUSERS to investigate such activity. So, making any necessary declaration at this stage (including any of PAID editing) would be sensible.

Of course, if there is some other logical explanation that I might have missed which will avoid having to ask a CU to investigate, please let me know. Pinging the original blocking admin, MER-C. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, to answer the question, I don't know from where you got that information, but I checked User:TheNavedKhan's page, and it was blocked on 17:12, 5 June 2020 (UTC)? How is it possible for it to edit till 23rd, June?[reply]

I don't if it was my 9th or 13th edit, but talking about my "doggedly" response to that draft is fun? I mean, I don't think I used my account to vandalize, I just did what felt interesting to me. Also, I am not paid to do any edits! Who pays for Wiki edits if everyone can edit?

Before the concerned draft, I had been declined two-three more drafts (they were short, so I didn't bother to use the Teahouse for them), this one had a long page, so I asked the community.

Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you. @Nick Moyes: @MER-C: Blissfulust (talk) 06:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See their contributions and failed block appeal at Special:Contributions/TheNavedKhan. So are you saying you are NOT blocked editor, User:TheNavedKhan? Thanks, Nick Moyes (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! @Nick Moyes: Blissfulust (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2020 (UTC) I don't have a personal connection. I will leave the draft for future. I don't want to get banned because of someone else's affairs.[reply]