User talk:Blink182182

June 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to New Found Glory has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: New Found Glory was changed by Blink182182 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863867 on 2013-06-22T17:21:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:21, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre edits

Hi Blink182182. I have reverted a few of your edits where you changed genre on music articles. Genre is a sensitive topic here at wikipedia and it is best to discuss proposed changes on the article's talk page first. The genre that are listed are often as a result of lengthy discussions and where there is existing consensus. One of the problems with using a single source to make changes, is that your source may list genre completely differently to another source that another editor has used. Even when the genre listen in the infox are unsourced they may be the result of Talk page consensus or supported by references in the body of the article. I am happy to discuss further and I hope you stay and continue contributing to wikipedia. best wishes Flat Out let's discuss it 03:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Holiday (Green Day song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox single

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Still Waiting (Sum 41 song), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Misrepresenting sources as you have done at this article is disruptive. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 02:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Genre sources

The source http://www.nme.com/reviews/6859 does not verify a genre of pop punk for this song. The review , which is an album review states: "After an opening batch of growly pop killers - 'Still Waiting', 'The Hell Song' - the swamp of chugga-chugga punk-pop mundanity runs deep, right up to a brace of painfully trite metal pastiches called 'Reign In Pain' and 'WWVII Part II'. 'Individuality' and 'imagination' are still foreign words to Sum 41, but at least 'Does This Look Infected?' is a promise to go to classes."

The mere mention of "punk pop" or "pop punk" as an element of a song is not enough. Find better sources. Flat Out let's discuss it

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at In Too Deep (Sum 41 song), you may be blocked from editing. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In too deep

Please make sure your edit summaries are honest. Dishonest ones like on In Too Deep isn't going to do any good. If you wanted to change the page lead, explain in your edit summary or consult that talk page. Iambrred (talk) 20:39, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]