User talk:Blastcat-iNat

Welcome!

Hello, Blastcat-iNat, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Blastcat-iNat, good luck, and have fun. JavaHurricane 06:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ligidium elrodii—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry about that, I'm still getting a feel for Wikipedia's editing format, for now I will stick to the sandbox. Blastcat-iNat (talk) 02:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Charentese amber moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charentese amber, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BangJan1999 20:15, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Blastcat-iNat. Thank you for your work on Porcellio scaber japonicus. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi there, nice work. The second reference doesn't seem to link to anything and the last one makes no reference to the subspecies itself. Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:27, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

@Hughesdarren: It looks like the pages have been delated? Are synonymized subspecies not allowed here on Wikipedia? I feel they should be allowed as taxonomy is often times subjective and the subspecies could always be un-synonymized, I also feel it could be helpful to inform the public about these once accepted subspecies; however, if they are not allowed I will restrain from creating them. Thank you! ~~~~ Nathan Jones Nathan Jones Blastcat-iNat (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry for all of the typos in that. Nathan Jones Blastcat-iNat (talk) 18:28, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

The admin who deleted it left the following comment - "articles for unaccepted subspecies are generally not indicated unless there is an unusual amount to say about them (which is not the case here)." Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I was not aware of that. Nathan Jones Blastcat-iNat (talk) 22:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charentese amber has been accepted

Charentese amber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:42, 14 April 2023 (UTC)