User talk:BlaineCreek
Welcome!
[edit]
|
March 2023
[edit] You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Politialguru. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 16:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, These accusations of sockpuppeting made against me are false. I would like to continue to edit Wikipedia but I will of course stop should my edits be undone. I would be glad if an administrator could investigate and report back with evidence which will clear my name concerning these allegations. Thank you BlaineCreek (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- My mistake, I did a global revert and omitted to uncheck this edit. Does nothing to detract from you being a block-evading sock mind... Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- I’ve posted on the admin notice board asking them to look into this issue. I would like to be able to edit freely regardless of your false allegations. BlaineCreek (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- My mistake, I did a global revert and omitted to uncheck this edit. Does nothing to detract from you being a block-evading sock mind... Mutt Lunker (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
BlaineCreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Mistaken identity - false allegations have been made I am a banned user, however this is not the case and my appeals have been ignored. BlaineCreek (talk) 21:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is as blatant as a WP:DUCK I have seen. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
BlaineCreek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Appeal to common sense and reason. It seems my previous request for an unblock was denied. As far as I can tell the evidence that I am a banned user is based on the fact I have edited similar (popular) pages which is completely circumstantial. Are there any tools available to me or admins to dispute these false allegations and be unblocked? Thank you BlaineCreek (talk) 21:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
CU confirmed sock puppetry Salvio giuliano 21:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.