Jump to content

User talk:Bladesmulti/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Special wishes...

[edit]


Hafspajen (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Season's Greetings

[edit]

Ekdalian (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Talkback for Tehran

[edit]
Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at Rye-96's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
[edit]

You're popular these days, aren't you? But what I don't get: why is Johnny attacking you, and then says that you are making personal attacks. [removed] Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Though, "peanut gallery" is also great. @Hafspajen: we need some decorations here! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What's going on today? Johnny & Johnny, 104~, Satyananda - somebody forgot to lock the doors? Every time I press the refresh-button for my watchlist, new threads pop-up. Or are we just plain nuts, and staying at the wrong places? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:15, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It maybe irritating at start, but later you would laugh. They think that we take them seriously. Also that 3RR report is getting funnier and funnier. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We have multiple copies of an IP who doesn't understand IP and so keeps adding copies. That is, the unregistered editor doesn't recognize intellectual property, and generates copies of himself and copies of stuff that should not be copied. Even if the IPs are not a banned editor, they still need blocking, and their pomposity is getting bizarre. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Surreal Barnstar
Who's ever seen this kind of slapstick: an edit-war at ANI, among all the other turbulence of today... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, this is still getting more bizarre... I'm going to turn it off now; I've seen enough madness for today. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:54, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

[edit]

Hello Bladesmulti :-). I have seen that you reverted some edits made by a banned-user. Well that is understandable, but as one of the editors with the most edits in Iranian-related articles (and also some in Armenian, Kurdish and Turkic-related), i would like to ask if i have the permission to restore those edits, well - of course after i have investigated it to see whether it was a acceptable edit(s) or not. My apologies if my English sounds a little bad right now, i have been quite tired recently. --Mossadegh-e Mihan-dust (talk) 22:17, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:BANREVERT, you cannot recover the changes that have been made by a banned user. When you are taking the responsibility of his changes, you will also discover that it is actually hard to even recognize that his versions have got a grip. If the subject comes from Safavid Empire and it is not liked by this banned user, he would highlight only those events that occurred in Afghanistan and mark rest of the Iranian geography as Safavid Iran. If he found that one citation is undue, he would probably remove those information that are due. But you can let me know any of the pages where you may have thought that his changes were important so that we can rephrase and use better citations. Bladesmulti (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If the info seems to be valid, check the sources, and if possible, improve it. In case of doubt, or just out of courtesy, discuss first at the talkpage. Reliable info is always welcome; just make sure it's reliable. And take your time to check the sources; that in itself is fun too. At leats it is to me; I like to learn new things. Best regards to all of you, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot

[edit]

Hi Bladesmulti, Thank you very much for taking care of my talk page while I was away. I appreciate it a lot. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 11:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to hear. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch IPs

[edit]

You're probably dealing with open proxies.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 11:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horrible people, those Dutch. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 12:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed during the ongoing SPI.[1] He has a large pool of proxies, yes they are mostly Dutch, but they are also from the United States, Ukraine, and others. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:05, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blades, have a look at Wikipedia:Ownership of articles#Statements: "Undo peanut-gallery editor." Sounds familiair, doesn't it? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"hostile comments from the peanut gallery". Yes! Bladesmulti (talk) 15:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

It appears that an IP is claiming that you are frauding at Middle Eastern American. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed that discussion. While I had no intention to look into content, as it was written by a banned user, I just saw that [2] actually mention Northern Africans, and supports that pointed sentence. The banned user is as usual gaming the system and misinterpreting the references. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volt60x SPI

[edit]

Hi Bladesmulti, Master and sock need to be interchanged. Volt60x was created after master account was blocked. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 05:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware that Volt60x was created at least 10 hours later. Although for comparison purposes, it is still better to keep the more significant account at start. Once we are done of investigation, it will be moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

can you help me

[edit]

there is a link on Valmiki Caste it indicates that boyar caste be merged into valmiki caste...how to fix it? and that article tells that it needs additional citations how can we fix this?Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (talk) 17:52, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I won't, until you use your main account to contact. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

do you really know how to fix it?Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i am here

[edit]

please reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (talk • contribs) 17:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please read this and good night

[edit]

editing a wikipedia article is very very hard because it needs citations when i was editing Valmiki Caste i did not sleep the whole night only for citations on internet.But I'm happy when i went and told that I edited Valmiki Caste they thanked me after reading this article.I will add some more infos on Valmiki Caste after few days because i want to refresh my mood bye see youAshutoshsinghkaulvalmiki (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mālāsana

[edit]

Nice, isn't it? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to write that they are very nice! Bladesmulti (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a break

[edit]

Just been reading through Hinduism, to have a break. Who'd ever expected that India-related pages could be a break from stress-inducing pages?... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree and that articles has a lot of interesting stuff. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bal Gangadhar Tilak

[edit]

Hi Bladesmulti,

In the article of Bal Gangadhar Tilak, there are few mistakes like place of birth. I have personally seen the birth place in the Ratnagiri city. So I have corrected the same with proper references. If you have any issues in this, please discuss with me....Coolgama (talk) 10:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are promoting a website there, that's why I removed your change. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:10, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Bladesmulti, I am not a newcomer for Wikipedia. I have put the correct/right information in the article. I have seen the birth place of Bal Gangadhar Tilak. Please do not revert. If you have any issues, please discuss. I am not promoting any website. Which website you are talking? Why I should be doing that? Please explain in details rather than just reverting.... Coolgama (talk) 11:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
iloveindia.com is a promotional link and you are removing other better citations for promoting that link. Don't add that promotional link again, and don't abuse minor change option because none of your changes on that page are minor. You are changing Chikhali village, Ratnagiri, to Ratnagiri, not even an improvement. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Keep up the good work. JimRenge (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Will :~] Bladesmulti (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback message from Tito Dutta

[edit]
Hello, Bladesmulti. You have new messages at User_talk:Titodutta/Adminship#Process_has_started.
Message added 11:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tito☸Dutta 11:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Behindwoods.com

[edit]

I have posted about this website on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Please do have a look at it. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 07:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jain

[edit]

You can read The complete works of Swami Vivekananda (Volume 3), what else you need. It's shocking, without reading the cited aricle you have removed the section. I have also mentioned on the talk page. [3]

Swami Vivekananda, viewed Jainism in its true perceptiveness and objectivity. He opined that Jainism was a great religion which putforth the concept of Ahimsa and Truth as its main principles.Swami Vivekananda explained how Jain moral principles saved Indian society from further degradation:

“What could have saved Indian society from the ponderous burden of omniferous ritualistic ceremonialism, with its animal and other sacrifices, which all but crushed the very life of it, except the Jain revolution which took its strong stand exclusively on chaste morals and philosophical truths? Jains were the first great ascetics and they did some great work. ‘Don’t injure any and do good to all that you can, and that is all the morality and ethics, and that is all the work there is, and the rest is all nonsense-the Brahmins created that. Throw it all away.’ And then they went to work and elaborated this one principle all through, and it is most wonderful ideal: how all that we call ethics they simply bring out from that one great principle of non-injury and doing good.” (Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, Volume 3)जैन (talk) 09:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unreliable blog, these quotes are not found outside that ridiculous blog and that fansite. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I mentioned the reason, also, please make Siddha a disambiguation link. Thank You. talkJain 03:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blades, it looks a little bit like you don't like Jains. Is that correct? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just don't like copyright violators. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:36, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have understood, the copyright thing now, I am a beginner. But, why do you want delete page Jain Sculpture, that I can't understand & the excuse given by you (we already have Jain Temple page) is weird.ProudJain (talk) 14:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's not helpful, it is just unnecessary to have 2 articles on same subject. We don't seperate Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi from Mahatma Gandhi' or Siddhartha Gautama or Gautama Buddha. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sir, Bill Gate's house and Bill Gates are two different things.ProudJain (talk) 14:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am talking about the content you had copied to that page, it is not different or anything new compared to Jain Temple. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not even a single line on Jain Temple and Jain Sculpture is same & the content I copied from external sources (without understanding the copyright concept) has been removed. Also, why were the references removed, can you tell? ProudJain (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by ProudJain (talk • contribs) 14:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are talking about the copied version or non-copied version which is almost nothing now. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:31, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I request you to leave this page for some time, there is so much information that can be added for the world to see. One more thing, visit Tamil Nadu, and you will find much about Jain Sculpture there and also converted ones, as there are more than 480 Jain Sites in Tamil Nadu. And I can see you don't want to help, as I asked for your help, but you just ignored & deleted it, it's okay, but shouldn't admins help beginners? ProudJain (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No help is possible when you are recovering the copyright violations and saying Why you don't help me?. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I asked you that how can I add an important news to the article, but you removed it. Why?ProudJain (talk) 14:43, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not engaging in edit war, I have corrected and then added the content, as small content can be added with references & one line is small. The news is important, as any one visiting Chandragiri Hills should know about the recent excavation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProudJain (talk • contribs) 14:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Recovering same copyright violation for more than 2 times is edit warring. Bladesmulti (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And please tell if a news report says "a temple measuring 100 ft in length found atop Chandragiri Hills", how I am supposed to add it?PJtalk 02:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have wrote that one important line & referred to the news. You are doing very wrong now, no copyright violation, nothing.ProudJain (talk) 14:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You had copied it, and you had moved Jain sculpture to Jain Sculpture (Tamil Nadu), so that you could make your own Jain sculpture but you couldn't so you made a Jain Sculpture. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No Jain sculpture in Thirupparankunram, Madurai, India to Jain Sculpture (Tamil Nadu)PJtalk 03:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[4] ? Bladesmulti (talk) 03:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalimpong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. Theresa Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

India edit unreasonable undo?

[edit]

Just wondering whether you could kindly explain why you had to undo my edit on India. I redirected "Dominion"to the the "Dominion of India", I don't think that's unreasonable. You also didn't justify your undo. Zaketo (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was removing the change of other user as well. I have reinserted your change. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Zaketo (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tapasya Dev

[edit]
File:Sock-tanker2.png
Blades' sock-tanker!

Looks like we've got a newbie running into trouble. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:57, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of his changes were really unique. Unique doesn't always means good. See Wikipedia:ANI#SPI, are you in touch with the investigation? Bladesmulti (talk) 08:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Unique"? You've got an unique way of thinking! ;) But I guess you mean "unique" as in "a distinctive type of editing from a particular, problematic editor"?
No, hadn't seen that one yet. What a list! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Vigyani is really cool! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sock tanker and of course Vigyani is actually helpful. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:08, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yups. --AmritasyaPutraT 16:26, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What should we do with List of Shudra Hindu saints. Created by a sock but not sure if enough non-sock content has been added to summarily delete the article. Or should I just delete every list of hindu saints? --regentspark (comment) 16:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could be deleted if he had created this kind of article in violation of block, he had probably created something new with his duck account, that's why it couldn't be deleted. Same with some articles of Russavia(a banned user). Bladesmulti (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Makes sense to me. I'll get rid of it. --regentspark (comment) 16:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]
Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Note that this is in relation to the warning I pronounced on WP:ANI just now [5]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:40, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New user

[edit]

Any thoughts on "User:Nilagriva"? Only 46 edits, and already POV-pushing. Is he "new"? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a new user. If he is so interested in this subject, he would have made at least 46 changes to these articles.(discount talk page(s)) Had attempted to edit war before, but stopped when it was his time to revert for the 4th time. Yes it is surprising. Bladesmulti (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And also JaguarEyes. Some Facebook-group calling-up activists? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 16:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Sock-hunter! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'?

[edit]

Is it [this]? Hafspajen (talk) 15:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Must have thought of removing trivial, they do believe that how 900 people would impact on the lives of millions of Swedish people or some other original research which is valid sometimes. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:48, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know. The Swedish don't really have any serious anti-Russian sentimensts as regarded as a nation as whole. They do joke a lot about them and the Russians get offended a lot but nobody really cares that they don't like those jokes. However nallebombning was rather serious. Hafspajen (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

)

[edit]

Why was this removed? https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sign_of_the_cross&diff=prev&oldid=643468648 Or it wasn't?

In the Catholic Church, a priest or deacon blesses with one sign of the cross over an object or person, but a bishop blesses with a triple sign of the cross; ordained bishops, priests and deacons have more empowerment to bless objects and people other than themselves; according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church the more a blessing is concerned with eccesial or sacramental matters, the more it is reserved to clergy.[1] The status of lay blessings in during distribution of communion is ambiguous. Extraordinary Ministers of Communion, blessing those who do not wish to or cannot receive communion can speak or raise the hand but not make the sign of the cross over the person.[2][3] In the Catholic organization, Legion of Mary, members doing door to door parish surveys bless the homes of those not home by tracing the sign of the cross on the door.[4] Although the sign of the cross dates to ante-Nicene Christianity, it was rejected by some of the Reformers, and is absent from some forms of Protestantism, although other forms of Protestantism, such as the Anglican Church and Lutheran Church use it. However, it has often been rejected by some Non-Conformist Protestants as being a High Church practice, despite Martin Luther's positive personal view. The prescribed use of the sign in Book of Common Prayer and the defence of the sign of the cross were established in Anglican canon law in 1604.

Sign of the cross. Hafspajen (talk) 16:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ The Catechism of the Catholic Church, Sacramentals, 1669 http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c4a1.htm
  2. ^ The Archdiocesan Manual for Parish Trainers of Extraordinary Ministers of Communion, Atlanta Archdiocese http://www.archatl.com/offices/chancellor/training/pdfs/2011-2012/2012-EMHC-manual-english.pdf
  3. ^ EWTN, Blessings for Non-Communicants http://www.ewtn.com/library/liturgy/zlitur81.htm
  4. ^ Legion of Mary Handbook
He just trimmed some of the sentences. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayurveda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest known...

[edit]

Sorry for removing your edit. It is true to the source, you are correct. NaturaNaturans (talk)

Thanks for writing. Bladesmulti (talk) 13:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Owais Khursheed/Mirza Ghulam Ahmad

[edit]

I have messaged many admins for the issue you mentioned, that it is identical as that of deletion to the same topic. well I don't think so and it has all its sources reliable. Let the admins decide what is good. Thanks

Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 10:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to add comments and discuss proposed changes in Criticism of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the article has reliable sources. Talk:Mirza Ghulam Ahmad#Criticism of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owais Khursheed (talk • contribs)


Trolls

[edit]
Spectators watching
The trolls

--Hafspajen (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Not in source

[edit]

diff Yep ;) Keep me sharp! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vivekananda move query

[edit]
Why you have changed 3 to 4? Bladesmulti (talk) 09:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meditation

[edit]

Hey Blades, I'm going to do an extra round of meditation; I'll send some peace to you. Take care, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Damn, now I'll have to do it... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]
Got that.. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Join in? Do you practice meditation? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, its good though. Bladesmulti (talk) 10:29, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relax

[edit]

Okay, deep breath, and relax. The sun is shining, also when it is cloudy. Or whatever. Just smile. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Sit down with a nice warm cup of tea. You presence is appreciated here :) --regentspark (comment) 16:16, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

[edit]

I have the right to blank my talk page. I am starting new. 80.2.172.185 (talk) 16:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need more light of sapience

[edit]

Kindly have a look on below and I ask for your comment if I am lacking somewhere to make the wiki page of a country which is supposed to be perfectly featured, a better page. Would 2001 updates be more relevant and quintessential to make the wiki reading experience enthusiastic than that of 2012 - the recent available well established government facts? diff diff On a positive and affirmative note, I invested a huge time and concentration to bringing up some very eminent and indispensable facts with good and comprehensive reasoning. Thanks for reading. hey_pal 08:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friend.hey (talk • contribs) You are doing good work, keep doing,,,,,,,,,,,,,thanks hey_pal talk 05:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Klostermaier

[edit]

See Klaus Klostermaier#Criticism. Groet, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had seen when it was inserted and was going to insert the views of Harold Coward. Bladesmulti (talk) 02:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

http://www.santabanta.com/cinema.asp?pid=39457 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.religion.hindu/ABa4IPNaiOQ

https://twitter.com/zoomindianmedia/status/199023217619374080

--Conradjagan (talk) 18:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See your talk page. Bladesmulti (talk) 06:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horses

[edit]

The horse-argument also has to be added to the archaeology-section at Indigenous Aryans. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction needed

[edit]

You're working on it? Please change "is regarding" in "disregarded". Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And the book that I have cited provides a lot about this. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical beach

[edit]

A tropical beach, without ANI - aaahh, that's a nice dream! Best, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So relaxing. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's snowing here... Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SPI Training

[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for your interest in the SPI training. I've added you to the current training cycle. When you have the chance, please take the time to complete the questions posted. Thanks, Mike V • Talk 19:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

I have been pissing you off for the past month. I have been a retard for the past month. I have been an ass to Wikipedia for the last month. I've been an ass, especially to you. I'm here to apologize to you, and PhilKnight as well. You did the right thing, by reporting me. I don't usually say this, but, you've turned me around. I used to be a real troublemaker around here, and earlier, Wikia. But, the way you look at it, it doesn't make you look cool. It makes you not well-liked, but, well-hated. This was the case with me. I was not impressing anybody, including you. In fact, it made you pissed off than ever. That was all my fault. But, my IP changes for no reason, and people including you mistake it for either block evasion or sockpuppetry. I apologize, but, I cannot change it. Bladesmulti, I now hate who I was back then, and I want to become a constructive editor now. I have learned what I done, was defeating the purpose of building an encyclopedia. I was destroying it. But now, I want to re-build it, clean up what I have done, and make a fresh start. Do you please accept this apology? If you do, I will be happy. Remember, always keep in your mind, it was my fault, not yours at all. 2620:117:C080:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:79A4 (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I apologize for making a second account. 2620:117:C080:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:79A4 (talk) 09:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Got that and you don't have to worry anymore. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Bladesmulti. 2620:117:C080:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:79A4 (talk) 09:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may be thirsty.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:117:C080:520:5E26:AFF:FEFE:79A4 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 2 February 2015‎

Christian terrorism mediation

[edit]

There are some proposed definitions we'd like to have your input on here.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]

I wrote on Talk:Voltaire and again on my talk page. Bladesmulti (talk) 01:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qzekrom (talk • contribs) 00:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Thanks for your support at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammad Ejuddin. Could you help against vandalism being done at Hebatullah-il-Moayed Fiddeen and Kasimkhan Zainuddin for deletion? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.176.145.3 (talk) 05:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nadir shah invasion of India

[edit]

Sir . Please add information in nadir shah invasion to india about the free of slaves by sikhs .When nadir shah attacked india he took precious booty and hindu and muslim girls as slaves to his country .The slaves were freed by sikhs by attacking him on his way back. thank you Aradhya (India) Aradhyasharma (talk) 08:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ms Sarah Welch: Something for you? Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will try inserting something about this event. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi blade can You add The latest Court case For the RSS of india on the RSS page?

[edit]

I've just spotted that the RSS is going through a court case in April, would it be possible for you to add this into the RSS wiki page so that other indians can see it? its very Important as it could result in The other indian parties as being deemed part of a Terrorist Group, could you also make sure to note that it was the american sikh group which pushed it into the courts, thank you.92.236.96.38 (talk) 13:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)Caplock[reply]

Ref http://sikhsiyasat.net/2015/02/04/usa-new-york-court-to-hear-sikhs-for-justice-lawsuit-against-rss-in-april/

Not really important right now, as it is more about what will happen. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oriya / Odia

[edit]

Hi, Oryia became odia, orissa became odisha and orissi became odissi in 2011 by the 113th ammendment bill passed the Sansad in 2011. And people will start referring it as Odia only when they'll know about it for which we have wikipedia. SUBHRAJIT ROUT (talk) 22:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Some links for your reference-[reply]

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/orissa-now-becomes-odisha-oriya-becomes-odia/199366-3.html
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-09-06/news/30119350_1_odia-amendment-bill-odisha
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Orissa-now-Odisha-Oriya-becomes-Odia/articleshow/5154302.cms
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/orissa-now-becomes-odisha-oriya-becomes-odia/199366-3.html
http://www.outlookindia.com/news/article/Orissa-Becomes-Odisha-Oriya-Becomes-Odia/740431

Nonetheless, we should not change all occurrences of the names, just as we do not use Kolkata for Calcutta when referring to it in the historical sense. - Sitush (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha (TV series)

[edit]

Hi! You recently added a source on this page. But I could not find the page no. on that book as that book is not available for preview. Can you please provide the link of that book which contains preview of that page which you added in the source? If you cannot provide it then it will be subject to removal in the future. I am just informing you. Thanks Terabar (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some weeks ago it was changed by a user who didn't knew well about Kapilavastu, I was just attempting to correct it. Section was tagged as undue, I have just cleared most of it. Bladesmulti (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me file an AE?

[edit]

I've never done it before, and I'm stumped on one of the first questions:

Sanction or remedy to be enforced
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/CASENAME#SECTION :

What do I put in place of Casename? Is it the name of the article? And what do I put for #Section?

Thank you in advance Atsme☯Consult 15:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Casename should be the person's name if you are pointing a particular user otherwise it should be the page's title if you are going to cite the problems with more than one or two users. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - what do I put in #Section? Atsme☯Consult 15:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC) PS - BLP if it's a BLP?[reply]
See [6] a recently declined case, and then see [7], #Section requires nothing, it is placed automatically after you save the page. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Atsme☯Consult 15:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Available, but can't spend much time

[edit]

Yes I am available, and interested in contributing too, but I have too little a time to spend than I would like to, for a few months. Is it about asking me if I can contribute on a particular something or about removing inactive users? - Inphynite (talk) 08:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion for Changing Vyasa page to Krishna Dvaipāyana Vyasa

[edit]

As discussed in Vyasa TALK page i have created a new page " Vyasa (title) ".But feel that the existing page Vyasa should be renamed to " Krishna Dvaipāyana Vyasa ", inorder to mention about the author of Mahabratha and his contribution.The new page "Vyasa (title) " should be the general platform for indicating all Vyasas ever existed . I have filed for this on Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard to obtain consensus among the various users involved.You are most welcome to go through Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard and tell your opinion.Thanks Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 05:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vyasa (title) looks pleasant. Bladesmulti (talk) 06:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The indian Padmanabhaswamy Temple which was Found with 893.644 kg and made world news

[edit]

If you get the chance could you pop into the wiki page Of Padmanabhaswamy temple with maybe some other editors and clean the page up about the indian treasure and maybe some images and so on?

Just woke up to see that Out of the over 800kg of gold found in this treasure, Over 200kg of gold is now missing, so i feel that the wiki page needs to be edited and checked and cleaned up if poss by You and others experienced editors, images of the treasure has not been added nore has the missing amount.http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/266-kg-of-gold-lost-from-temple/article6893987.ece92.236.96.38 (talk) 09:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)Caplock[reply]

Just seen Talk:Padmanabhaswamy Temple#The Sree Padmanabhaswamy gold Heist. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Went through everything you gave me, checking manually (i.e. not relying on the Duplicate Detector), and I don't see anything that deserves a warning or sanctions. As far as I can see, everything's either coincidences ("first bishop of the", for example) or basically the only way to put it. Nyttend (talk) 23:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign Exchange. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavishya

[edit]

Why did you delete Vedas? Your brain must be formatted (FORMAT C:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.67.98.183 (talk) 08:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You copied it from another blog. Bladesmulti (talk) 11:38, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thiruvalluvar

[edit]

I recently read a book by Bhartiya Gyanpeeth, which mentions that Thiruvalluvar was a Jain saint & dedicated first chapter of Tirukkural to Tirthankara Adinath of Jainism. ISBN 978-93-263-5254-3जैन (talk) 03:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Well, I've recieced a mail from you asking whether I'm active on wikipedia anymore, and here's what I've to say. I really don't remember the last time I logged in, but after my graduation is over, I'll get plenty of time to edit again. Please, reply. Soumit Banerjee (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bladesmulti/Archive_6&oldid=1161861676"