User talk:Blackhouse123

Welcome!

Hello, Blackhouse123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --ColtsScore 12:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Googlism

Hi Blackhouse123. I was wondering what you were going for with creating an identical copy of Googlism under another, unusually spelled name? Note that if you want people to be able to find an article when typing a different, plausible construction of the name, instead of creating a copy, you should create a redirect.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Googlism religion

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Googlism religion, by Matticus78, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Googlism religion is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Googlism religion, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Googlism religion itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 {{user anglican}},

Christine118500 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Googlism.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Googlism.JPG. The copy called Image:Googlism.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:31, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:The_church_of_google.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The_church_of_google.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 17:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:The church of google.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:The Church of Google.jpg. The copy called Image:The Church of Google.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google religion

Please do not continue to create articles about this "religion". It has been deleted after two deletion discussions (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Church of Google and Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 December 20). Wikipedia's notability guidelines require that there be external sources of information about a topic - we are not free advertising. If you would like to ask that this action be reconsidered, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Thank you. --BigDT 23:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thechurchofgoogle.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thechurchofgoogle.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I disagree with googlism, as it doesn't exist, and is make believe!

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

?

What's this all about? Staecker 15:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]