User talk:Blackbox77

MLS

Yes? -- Grant .Alpaugh 00:39, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ice Climber peer review

I left some comments at the peer review. — Levi van Tine (t – c) 07:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SoftimageLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SoftimageLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MLS and Canada

While MLS has teams in Canada, they can not qualify for the CCL by winning an MLS achievment, either MLS cup or supporters shield. Only domestic teams, ie US teams are able to. Canadian teams can only qualify for the CCL via the Canadian cup, their domestic competition.

It's the same as Major League Baseball. They are both US leagues with a Canadian team.

I'm very much open to your views especially if you have additional information, or information that refutes the resolution as establish in the talk page.

Instead of having an edit war, I think we should further discuss the issue in the talk page.Triplehelix76 (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Softimage

Stop reverting my edits on the Softimage page. Explanations as an edit comment. Are you an employee or evangelist of the Autodesk Softimage line of products? If you are not, I suggest you stop adding advert-like statements to articles. If you are, then please understand the wikipedia is strictly neutral and does not support additions of sales information such as pricing. Feature that on the Softimage online store instead.

Nomination of New York Cosmos (2010) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New York Cosmos (2010) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Cosmos (2010) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.unak¹⁹⁷⁸ 09:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmos

If you're serious about wanting to find a compromise, then I want to give mediation a try. I only want an impartial party to hear my side of the argument and bring balance to the discussion. So far, though you disagree with me in general, you've shown some willingness to understand the basis from which my argument is coming from. Starting with you I want to try to get other editors to agree to try to mediate an impartial presentation for this article. Let me know if you're ok with that and I'll contact the other users involved in the original merge discussion and we'll move from there. unak¹⁹⁷⁸ 08:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Seattle Sounders Women logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seattle Sounders Women logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:43, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Major League Soccer on television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLS AllStar 1998.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLS AllStar 1998.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLS AllStar 2000.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLS AllStar 2000.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

E.S. Rose Park

Hey there, just a quick note on your recent move of E.S. Rose Park. I had a similar situation with the J. I. Clements Stadium page, the details of which can be found in the article history. Essentially, I created the page as J.I. Clements Stadium, per its sources. Geologik soon moved the page to J. I. Clements Stadium (where it eventually stayed) per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)#Middle names and abbreviated names. The relevant section of it reads, "There is no consensus for always using spaces between initials, neither for never using them. However, in most Wikipedia articles where the subject uses two consecutive initials, the space between initials is used; see Literary initials."

Given that there's no consensus, I think we're within bounds to go with either E.S. Rose or E. S. Rose, though the "most Wikipedia articles" phrase inclines me towards restoring the space. What are your thoughts? I figured we could contact Geologik, post something on the college baseball project's talk page, or simply decide something by ourselves. Whatever we choose, I'd like to make the J. I. Clements and E.S. Rose articles the same, given that the cases are so similar. I'll watch your talk page if you'd like to keep the discussion here, but feel free to respond at my talk page, if you'd prefer. Kithira (talk)

The inconsistent styling of abbreviations and initials has always bothered me. To add a space or not add a space? Personally I find the space between punctuated initials visually jarring - especially in these cases where the article isn't even about the person the structure is named for. Some more names to ponder... PPL Park, LP Field and other stadiums including abbreviated corporation names with no punctuation. Would we ever type P P L Park or L P Field? Then there's Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium, not named for a business but instead for a person. Or is it R.F.K. Stadium? Or R. F. K. Stadium? Or just RFK Stadium (that is used in the article)? Although the title is not abbreviated, the structure is universally known by its acronym. Another example could include U.S. Cellular Field, a stadium named for a sponsor that includes punctuation. Should we type U.S. Cellular and J. I. Clements just because the former is an abbreviation and the latter are initials (when the word "initials" is just a fancy word for "a name that is an abbreviation")? So much inconstancy...

I will admit however I was unaware of the middle names and abbreviated names section of the naming conventions guide. Although it does say there is no consensus, it is pretty clear what is used most often. In light of this, I'd be perfectly fine with someone reverting "E.S. Rose Park" back to "E. S. Rose Park" even though I prefer my edit. Honestly, I should have just brought this up for discussion instead of acting too bold. --Blackbox77 (talk) 03:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. I'll bring up the subject over at the college baseball project to see if anyone has a third opinion. If there's none, I think I'd feel most comfortable going with what seems to be used most. However, I think you make an interesting point. I'm not so sure that the thinking behind Literary initials does apply to initials used in a structure name. If you ever decide to bring that up for wider discussion, let me know. Also, I don't at all think you were too bold in moving the page, and thanks very much for discussing. Kithira (talk) 04:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"I'm not so sure that the thinking behind Literary initials does apply to initials used in a structure name." Exactly, I think that's what it boils down to for me. Unfortunately, no matter how you slice it, it's still a person's name. The issue is really larger than how to name a stadium. Abbreviations across Wikipedia for all subject matter need to be made universally consistent...but who really has the time to fight that battle? (Ha!) --Blackbox77 (talk) 04:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I try to keep telling myself that every little bit helps. Really though, I wonder who even wrote the section that we're giving so much attention to. Kithira (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A couple people have chimed in at the college baseball project, and both favor putting in the space, so I'll go ahead and make the change. Thanks again for discussing, Kithira (talk) 14:54, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nashville Metros logo 2012.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Nashville Metros logo 2012.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Real Salt Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Real (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLS East.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLS East.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLS West.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLS West.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLS Cup 2012 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLS Cup 2012 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blackbox77. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blackbox77. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2013 MLS SuperDraft logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2013 MLS SuperDraft logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MLS Cup 2004 logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLS Cup 2004 logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]