User talk:Black Kite/Archive 76

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, From Here, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dom from Paris (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

thought you might be looking for this

per your post here

I found it

— Ched (talk) 16:06, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Banned, but not entirely.

My guess is, EC will likely be making many more socks, now that he's got nothing to lose ;) GoodDay (talk) 15:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Yep. - Sitush (talk) 15:53, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

And he'll still be more productive as a short-lived sock than any of those at the ARC who wanted him shooed off the project. Cassianto^Talk 17:33, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Ain't nothing wrong with productive socks :) GoodDay (talk) 18:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Renaming of music articles to remove "The" from disambiguators

Dicklyon has already set about renaming The xx's articles, even after you raised concerns about this specific band at AN. I'd really be uncertain as to starting a more in-depth, full-scale discussion on the matter...would doing so even halt his moves? Because I kind of doubt it, as a lot of editors will continue acting under previous "consensus" no matter how unclear or dubious until/unless a different one is achieved. Ss112 00:48, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Daniel Johnston

On 14 September 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Daniel Johnston, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Spencer^T•C 03:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of article Parks on the Air

Hi, I just noticed that yesterday after reviewing all the keep and delete votes, that you've decided to delete the article Parks on the Air. I don't know if you've noticed the recent addition of several references to notable news articles in the new section I created (which makes the article most noteworthy) called Activities/Events. In there, ham radio operators go to parks, and are operating 'on the air' there at those various locations and it was recorded in several news articles. When I originally created the article, I was at a search engine Yahoo which unfortunately didn't provide many articles for me to reference but I did have a few (like QRZ.com). However, after searching with different key words and using Google instead, it had produced many other very interesting/helpful articles for me to use in the article. If there are sections or paragraphs or specific sentences which could be cleaned up/removed from the article to prevent it from looking self-promoting, I'm more than happy to work on those parts. I respectfully ask that you reconsider your decision to delete the article and consider which areas could be cleaned up to have it kept in Wikipedia. Thanks for your time Zul32 (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

• I'm quite happy to drop it back to Draft: space if you wish - let me know. Black Kite (talk) 00:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Sure, that would be fine.. but again, I'm not an expert article writer, so I could use a few pointers as to which specific parts of it were key in making it too much 'self promoting'. I also don't want the other admins to immediately take it upon themselves to think that they're obligated to delete the article since you didn't without doing a reasonable once-over of it. Thanks Zul32 (talk) 03:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
    • I've done that. However, the article's biggest problem is not that it's promotional, but it's sourcing; there's practically no good third-party sources outside the scene itself. See WP:N. That's what you need to sort out first. Black Kite (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Closing statement

Greetings, Black Kite. Just a small note about your closing statement. I believe there is a "not" in it that you should delete since it alters the meaning of what you clearly meant to say. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 21:20, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

• Whoops - fixed. Thanks. Black Kite (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Neal Ludevig

Hello!

As I'm new to Wiki, I wasn't able to find where I could comment on the ongoing discussion for this page, and now I see its too late! I wanted to provide additional input in questions in the creation of this page.

That being said, a few things:

I have not coordinated with the subject of this article at all. I'm confused on why this was deleted, or couldn't just be modified. Echoing Luke Kindred, this is the work of most promoters - the events they do are the basis of their work, not themselves, hence why many of the articles have him quoted as oppose to him being the subject of the article itself. A number of the events that the subject of the article, Neal, has done received substantial press, and he's been covered and interviewed in it (WNYC, NPR, Public Library to name a few), plus major outlets providing coverage (Daily News, NY Times, Artnet) with him being quoted. What more would you be looking for? And similarly, think of people like Michael Lang, or Peter Shapiro but younger - this guy is on the same path and the work speaks for itself.

I'm asking because I originally was hoping for some constructive criticism in making the article better because never did I imagine it would be outright deleted - I thought this was contribution based! What is the language that needs to be added to make it sufficient? Is there any reversal process here?

Again, I'm new to this, but didn't think this would happen. How was this is written promotionally, how? Most of the statements were truthful statements with a credible backing article.

Is there a way you or GPL93 can retrieve the article so it can be improved? Please advise!

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Talfredou (talk • contribs) 16:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Warning

Hi Hope you doing good. I received a warning for doing some unnecessary stuff and I would like you to know some,

That none of them would have happened if proper response was provided.

I said about Rotten Tomatoes list about best movies of genre such as animation, superhero are rightly based on the adjusted score of critics and the response I received was like these

🤦‍♂️ Perhaps just leaving the awful thing out of the page is the best thing that can be done.

And you failed to see that? Ashokkumar47 (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

• No, I saw that very clearly. However, Wikipedia works on consensus, so it doesn't matter how correct you think you are, you don't get to add that information if a majority of other editors provide good reasons why it shouldn't. Black Kite (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

If a proper response was provided I would have left promptly.

Maybe your editor should know how to give a response. Ashokkumar47 (talk) 01:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quote

Hi. The quote at the top has an extra word in it: ... moral and social conventions you ... know lack of all foundation. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 09:51, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Notice

Hey! Seems Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midnight Sun Brewing Company wasn't properly closed, since half of the AfD isn't in the archive template. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Deletion review for Gage Creed (character)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gage Creed (character). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:32, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ginger Baker

On 6 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ginger Baker, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Mitu Bhomick Lange

Hi again- re the Australian Indian Film festivals; someone has written an article about the founder Mitu Bhowmick Lange. I copy edited and wikilinked it to the other articles about a week ago, and sure enough it got attacked within 3 days. Would you be able to apply protection to that one too? They also attempted to coatrack the same accusations onto another article of Indian actress, Dia Mirza who appeared in one of the films as well. Curdle (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

• Protected one, watched the other, blocked the user and revision deleted the text. Thanks for letting me know. Black Kite (talk) 12:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you! pity this person can't find something a bit more constructive to do with their time :) Curdle (talk) 09:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

You have an email

Hello, Black Kite. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— Barkeep49 (talk) 22:51, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks. Being dealt with - I've unclosed the ANI section. Black Kite (talk) 00:43, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:In the news

"In rugby union, the World Cup ends with South Africa defeating England in the final ((Man of the Match Duane Vermeulen pictured)." Please remove the extra bracket. SLBedit (talk) 21:29, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

• Someone beat me to it. Thanks for the heads up. Black Kite (talk) 21:30, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Regarding my three reverts

Hi, you questioned about my threee reverts here but I just want to tell that user was indefinitely blocked by Admin for not being here. Also, this discussion came here after merger of criticism of swaminarayan sect article. Most of the involved editors didn't represent clear consensus for that and just look at that the editors who 'represented consensus'. They are behaving like single person in all criticism of that sect related articles. Regards, -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 14:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

• Can you post this at the AE page - it would be better if I replied to it there. Black Kite (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Where to post?— Harshil ^{want to talk?} 01:16, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 02:48, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Revolve NTNU page updated not approved

Hi mate!

I hope I am doing this correctly. Recently you have canceled and edited back our update on the Revolve NTNU page]]

Can you please help us understand what on that update of ours was "promotional and etc"?

We have tried to follow the guidelines and all but yet its not enough..

Best regards Rafi Khajeh

• Hi - You added a section with links only to NTNU (these are primary sources - see WP:PSTS) and they are written from the perspective of NTNU (see WP:PROMO Section 4). Compare the original version, which was secondary sources. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 08:05, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
• You may also wish to keep in mind, Mr Khajeh, that there is an [conflict of interest] in you writing this article, bearing in mind who you might be. Cassianto^Talk 08:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Gary Rhodes

On 27 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gary Rhodes, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for blocking the anon ip

I saw this thread on twitter and was pleased to see it had already been jumped on and resolved appropriately. Thank you. dm (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

+1 -Pete Forsyth (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ron Saunders

On 8 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ron Saunders, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:37, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Merry!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!

Hello Black Kite, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 15:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

• Thank you, and the same to you. Black Kite (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Hello Black Kite: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, DBigXrayᗙ Happy Holidays! 15:40, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

• Thank you, and the same to you. Black Kite (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020!
	Hope you enjoy the Christmas eve with the ones you love and step into the new year with lots of happiness and good health. Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year!CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはBlack Kiteたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:58, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth/Evidence. Please add your evidence by January 14, 2020, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/RHaworth/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, CodeLyoko^talk 03:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Black Kite!

Happy New Year!

Black Kite,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 21:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.