User talk:Bjenks/Archive8

hope you might catch up some way

Today we're in the library again - but I personally might not be easy to catch up with until April or May - trust all is well JarrahTree 03:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Things are a bit iffy. Have got word my youngest son has died in Port Pirie and am awaiting a funeral date...Bjenks (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Very sorry to hear JarrahTree 06:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Perth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rockingham -DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks--that's now fixed. Bjenks (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16

. . . when you recently edited List of political parties in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GST --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks--that's now fixed. Bjenks (talk)

as the wa med associations had on their bumpersticker many moons ago

Better late than 'the late'

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/50 - apologies for late notice - hope you are able to make it!! JarrahTree 04:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

yup

still if you want me to come and check things as discussed some time ago (in a few weeks) please email me with details JarrahTree 04:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

. . . you recently edited James Inglis (Australian politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evening News (--DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, it's now fixed. Bjenks (talk) 03:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bjenks. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

...when you recently edited Golf Digest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Rock. --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, it's now fixed. Bjenks (talk) 14:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

File:SBP Party logo.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I was just a messenger for this, so I'll just let the process do the work. Bjenks (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Xmas

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

ho ho ho

even if you cannot make it sunday re https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/55 - must make up for 3 month (4 months or more) oover half a year - overdue possible visit sometime... (maybe I need to continue the rest of conversation on email) JarrahTree 01:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

I do hope all is forgiven and I can still catch up in some manner or other JarrahTree 11:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Discussion on scope of the "Sailing ship" article

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sailing ship#Scope?, regarding what should be included in the article. You'll find a proposed outline, there. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Studebaker § E-M-F

As I hadn't previously heard the acronym wags, I did check the dictionary. In the context of the Studebaker article as used, 'wags' would be referring to "wives and girlfriends." It sounds a bit demeaning so I don't agree with the usage of 'wags', but it was valid during that era.

If wags is slang for something else, please specify exactly what in the Reason box.
Do not insult my intelligence by accusing me of failing to consulting a dictionary prior.
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I intended no offence, so am sorry that you feel hurt. A dictionary reference is the logical way to explain the distinction between WAG and wag (which is NOT a slang word). My American Funk & Wagnalls gives: Wag n "A droll or humorous fellow; a wit; joker".

Collins online dictionary gives: [4. countable noun] A wag is someone who makes jokes. [humorous, or old-fashioned] He's a bit of a wag, his dad. "As one wag observed, the only people completely free from stress are the dead." Synonyms: joker, comic, wit, comedian.

Yes, there is also a millennial acronym "WAGs" meaning "wives and girlfriends", but this would not seem appropriate in the 1908 EMF context. What dictionary did you consult prior? Bjenks (talk) 15:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

You're defining 'wags' as "wives and girlfriends" as being a more recent (millennial) usage would appear to correlate with my search results. My modus operandi was to perform a broad search and view the most common results returned - "wives and girlfriends". It would seem that the sources I had used were so contaminated with the millennial definition as to mask the definition I had been looking for, the one you've stated above.

It is unclear whether I could have found the correct usage of the word through a shotgun approach. I apologize for the misunderstandings. It seems you knew what you were looking for, while I didn't. I still recommend defining questionable words in the Reason box when performing an Undo to avoid confusion. Likewise, I will reconsider my approach to better avoid millennial definitions.

Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 20:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Please create a new article

{https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Australian_Democrats&action=history this]] pls — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.164.212.168 (talk) 04:09, 13 July 2019 (UTC) Wider implication globally, pls dont be emotionally attached, please be open, or create the redirect page to "keep the bastads honest" 03:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.164.212.168 (talk) You/me dont own wiki, not your personal blog, we die all chnanged, wikipedia replaced by other alternatives, you can still maintain your history, you put efforts, respect, I own it too, respect and let go. Love and hug. 222.164.212.168 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Wider implication globally, pls dont be emotionally attached, please be open, or create the redirect page to "keep the bastads honest". You/me dont own wiki, not your personal blog, we die all chnanged, wikipedia replaced by other alternatives, you can still maintain your history, you put efforts, respect, I own it too, respect and let go. Love and hug.

This "notion", of what oz democrate did, STOP owning and manipulating, do not edit out the wider positive influence, pls dont be emotionally attached to your "narrow tunnel". Either we keep my edits or you please create the redirect page to "keep the bastads honest", or spend time keeping all your "emotionally attached" edits honest.xYou have yours and I have mine edits. Peace, love and hug. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 04:38, 13 :July 2019 (UTC)

In spite of your communication difficulties and your unjustified personal attack on me, you have some interesting ideas which deserve to be shared on the article's talk page, as I suggested in the first place. Bjenks (talk) 05:41, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

You are forbidden to edit oz-democrats

Sorry mate. Under wiki's Closely related and COI policies, you are forbidden to edit oz-democrats related pages. 222.164.212.168 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:11, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Noted. I think it's time for you to quit writing nonsense on my talk page. Bjenks (talk) 05:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)