User talk:Björnebacke

Welcome!

Hello, Björnebacke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! 16:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Discussions

Please use your original account, stop making new accounts. If your preferred account is blocked, ask for that account to be unblocked. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Björnebacke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting for my old account User:Irthpr to be suspended and this one to be unblocked and counted as my master account. Björnebacke (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. — Sandstein (talk) 17:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Bj%C3%B6rnebacke (block log • ipblocklist • rangeblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • creation log • unblock)
Reason for unblocking:

Now I've done exactly what you told me to, this is the page I edited http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Narva_%281700%29&action=edit&oldid=203306978, sources added and everything just one more question though, can you make this my preffered "masteraccount" instead of Irthpr, that would be great
by changing {{unblock}} to {{unblock|your reason here}}.
If your reason contains a URL with a "=" in it you will need to add "1=" to the start of your reason or else it will not display correctly.

Note: In some cases, a user may not in fact be blocked, or their block may be expired. Please check your block log. If no blocks are listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.

Administrator use only: If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following as notification.

{{unblock reviewed|1=original unblock reason|decline=reason — ~~~~}}

If you accept the request (note that you MAY NOT unblock your own account), replace the unblock template with {{tlx|unblock|reason}}, and post the following directly underneath the unblock template:

{{subst:Request accepted|reason}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Björnebacke (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

is that it? We are looking for a substantial improvement to an article in your userspace not in main space - you are blocked remember. That efforts wasn't anywhere near acceptable — Spartaz ^Humbug! 16:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: I've blocked the five other accounts associated with this one. Note to User:Björnebacke -- stick to a single account. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 05:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

I have unblocked this account under the following terms:

You are to discuss your edits, and only edit when discussion reaches consensus. Point in edit summaries to this consensus
You are to stick to this account, do not edit using other accounts.

If you breach this you will be blocked again.

If your IP is blocked, request unblock using {{unblock-ip}} or {{unblock-auto}} (click the templates to see the explanation), and point to this section on this talkpage.

Happy editing. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 2008/ 30 years

I have reverted an edit of yours on the Thirty years war could you please add sources when changing well sourced parts of an article. 安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 08:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The source used for the claim that I removed were not valid in my eyes, no litterature references in the page or anything like that, anyone could have written it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Björnebacke (talk • contribs) 19:18, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Okay I'm fine with you reverting it but could you please source it and please sign your talks --安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 19:19, 10 December 2008(UTC)

Source what? That the majority of mercenaries were german?Björnebacke (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a source which says that then, it can be a book or a site or a research paper regards 安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 19:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angående Swedes

Var snäll och diskutera dina ändringar först, för som du kan se här Talk:Swedes, så håller inte alla med. "Arabic" och "Vikings" ska dessutom ha stor bokstav i början. Hälsningar, Nymf _talk/contr. 23:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that one of the conditions of your unblock was to discuss your edits first. Nymf _talk/contr. 23:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]