User talk:Bionoetics
May 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm Smirkybec. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Science Foundation Ireland, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Smirkybec (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Smirkybec. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Irish Music Rights Organisation seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Smirkybec (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dublin City University, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We welcome new editors, and need the hands - but your additions to the article were poorly written, inappropriately sited, and, most seriously, cast aspersions on (living) people. Please discuss on the Talk page before re-approaching such material. SeoR (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dublin City University, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Further to the above warning, you also synthesised potential conclusions, and / or posed rhetorical questions (which is not appropriate in a tertiary source such as an encyclopedia), potentially impugning whole organisations (re the university's accreditation, respect for court rulings, etc.). Please don't. SeoR (talk) 20:24, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Bionoetics, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Bionoetics! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC) |
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bionoetics, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.