User talk:Bilgiljilll

These two paragraphs are hateful and negative . The citations are wrong. Kindly look into this issue

hi Bilgiljilll! I'm admittedly unfamillar with the situation (I initially thought it was a case of hiding racist content instead of removing misinformation), however if someone reverts your edit, please discuss your changes in the relevant talk page instead of restoring it immediately. happy editing! 💜 melecie talk - 10:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thank you for your guidance , but these vandalisers have added unrelated citations to confuse admins .I hereby humbly request you to keept the revision. Other admins are restoring it ,i have started a talk on the page but ,there is no response from there .

Welcome!

Hi Bilgiljilll! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! R.C^{Outlander07@talk} 13:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Improper usage of citations

Please donot frequently use the same source for each and every statement made as you did in the Ezhava article or else you can quote the source title at the end of your statement. R.C^{Outlander07@talk}

Sure, thankyou for the suggestion:) Bilgiljilll (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, In addition to that i have also added some valuable information with reference,based on my knowledge and what i read from the sources , i request you to kindly review that . Bilgiljilll (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Ezhava

I've rolled back your changes for a number of reasons: (1) non-standard capitalization (e.g., capitalizing words like "farmer" while not capitalizing words like "Sanskrit"), poor grammar, but most importantly, questionable sourcing. You frequently use <ref name="Smith1976pp31-3243">[[Ezhava#Smith1976|Pullapilly (1976)]] which doesn't make any sense; how is someone supposed to figure out how to find that work you are talking about? Some of the other sources you threw in don't make mention of the tagged topic at all; This reference was used after a secion talking about Buddism, which the source doesn't mention at all. I suggest you propose your changes at the talk page first. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for the edits you made , but i really urge you to add the "wealthy landlords as well as upper sections, Part ,atleast in the past occupation section , its important to mention as the upper layer of the community and the titled one have no representation till now in this page , this community had a good disparity within them and its important to mention it . Bilgiljilll (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The people who were titled panicker are missing from this page , it need to be added . Bilgiljilll (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also in the occupation section also most of the occupation are missing , the source notes that 20 percent were traders which is missing , ayurvedic physicians were missing. Bilgiljilll (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding buddist origin ,the Buddhist origin of ezhavas are mentioned in almost all of the books , the page itself use the word "the buddist past and refusal to give up pushed the caste to an. Outcasted society. Bilgiljilll (talk) 18:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Given referance social mobility in kerala ,page no:55 ,second paragraph clearly states regarding the title , the panicker title is memtioned in the panicker surname page also kindly check it Bilgiljilll (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Take these suggestions to Talk:Ezhava (2) please follow instructions at Wikipedia:Citing_sources and Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Linking_to_Google_Books_pages. A citation such as "Smith 1976 p 5" is useless. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure,thanks actually i am a beginnerin editing ,hence i thought expalinung in the edit log is enough , thank you for your guidance, will do for sure :) Bilgiljilll (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again I thoroughly read the content and citation ,while i accept the typo errors made by me , i found out that around 70 percent of the citations in the page are in the similar way only . Also i would like to know why you allowed , the inscription section edit ehich is made on 4 march 2022(made by Anonymous user ) with sources which are not even readable ...I think that need to be verified , and removed , as a native i feel that the inscription part given in the page is wrong. Also 70 percent of the citations in the page are like that only ,after checking the citation again, i feels that it is a big injustice to the time and effort i invested in researching and improving the page , hence ,i humbly request you to kindly check that . Bilgiljilll (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I really do feel that , deleting all my contributions were injustice , when similar edits were allowed , mine just happened to be recent. Bilgiljilll (talk) 21:14, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

edit request ezhava

There is an edit request in Ezhava talk page, can you please add? It has been for 2 weeks : https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Ezhava 173.66.121.55 (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Fyrael. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mundum neriyatum, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suzdal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamenka. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Rhetorical stance

added a link pointing to Stance

Sophist

added a link pointing to Excellence

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to CrowdJustice, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I've reverted a bunch of nonconstructive links, per MOS:OL, and there are more. Continuing to add these will be seen as disruptive. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:48EE:464F:CE18:8A14 (talk) 17:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I thought it would make its more understandable . I will take next time Bilgiljilll (talk) 02:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay attention to what you are linking to on-site, too. Petting does not go to anything pertinent to cats, so your change at Cat massage has been reverted. I'm not sure that the word "petting" should go to that article it goes to (a matter for WP:RFD, perhaps). But it does. We have to check where our links are going before saving changes. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 05:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sure :) Bilgiljilll (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many of these links are inappropriate to the point of absurdity. Later today I'm bringing this to ANI. There's no indication that you've read MOS:OL or have tried to understand the guideline. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding to which article or page ? Bilgiljilll (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nambudiri

You have "pinged" me to the Talk:Nambudiri page, but as I am not an admin, I can't protect it. As Hölderlin2019 has 687 edits, and you have 616, the only level of protection that would work is full protection, so only admins could edit it. This is unlikely to be granted at this point. You need to make your case, citing WP:Reliable sources at Talk:Nambudiri - best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 15:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about giving a message to holderin2019 that is what i meant actually. Bilgiljilll (talk) 15:56, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nationality

added links pointing to Common and Group

Annie Mascarene

added a link pointing to Administration

Panicker

added a link pointing to Syrian Catholic

R. Sankar

added a link pointing to Administrator

Rhetorical stance

added a link pointing to Stance

Thirra

added a link pointing to Toddy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , syrian catholics have gotten the title panicker its in the page reference and toddy is linked in almoat all pages , i didnt linked any today. There was a discussion regarding linking and i did slow down. Bilgiljilll (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Panicker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian Catholic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

stop your 'vested interest' disruptive editing

stop your 'vested interest' disruptive editing at the article Cheerappanchira. In the 2 news channel video it is correctly saying by cheerappanchira pancker that 'cheerappanchira panicker went to moolatharawad at kadathanad' and the story of body armor of ayyappa. I know you are a Malayali editor , keep on disruptive editing will get you out of Wikipedia. Mathrubhumi video on 1:50 , also asianet(acv) at 3:13 cheerappanchira panckier says about their family origin from Kadathanad.

Non-Malayalam speaker can clearly hear the word 'Kadathanad' , also they can just translate to see from Malayalam to English Afv12e (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You added it again back without even minding to solve the dispute shows that who have that vested interest. Bilgiljilll (talk) 19:26, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Afv12e (talk) 17:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bilgiljilll (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I just saw that i was blocked in relation with athiestkerala , i have been a contributer since 2 years, i didnt involve in any sockpuppetry, i do not even remember seeing the username how i am a sockpuppet of athiest kerla? ,kindly do let me know that where did i do sockpuppetry ??

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Wannabesomething123, itself a blocked sockpuppet account. Yamla (talk) 14:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.