User talk:Bilad il Islamia

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I want to know how to add an Infobox to an article without copy-paste from other articles, Is there any template by which I can add desired Infobox to an article? Sinner 08:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

You should not be editing articles until/if you are unblocked. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bilad il Islamia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I, User:Nazim Hussain Pak created this account to have more coverage and wider view of wikipedia. I created this account because I needed it and still badly need it. I didn't know the concept of sock puppetry and I kept on parallely using these accounts. Administrator:Yunshi blocked me indefinitely. I need this account very much. Now, I have mentioned this account on my userpage of Nazim Hussain Pak. I request Please unblock my account User:Bilad il Islamia. I promise I shall never hurt wikipedia, and I will never use my account to abuse wikipedia. I will never make vandalism. I humbly request please! please! Unblock my this account. I shall be very very thankful for this act of kindness.

Sinner 11:26, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I saw the uses you put this account to. That has nothing to do with improving the encyclopedia. There are zero non-trivial beneficial edits from this account, and one of those trivial beneficial ones was to the same article you also edited with User:Nazim Hussain Pak. That doesn't agree with your reasoning as to why you need a second account. Huon (talk) 23:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In what way do you need this account? Why do you need more than just one account? only (talk) 11:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bilad il Islamia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked and I ensure no vandalism and no violation for coming time. I need this account to

watch different aspects of community which are in such a large number having look over them is impossible with one account
to have wider and easier look over the pages that are on my focus separately in these two accounts
easily communicate users who know me with this name
to avoid a situation of trouble that I have been facing for more than 25 days because I am to use single account from moment when this account was blocked.

I ensure wikipedia will not be hurt when my account is unblocked onwards. I want this account be unblocked as it will not cause any harm to wikipedia and it will create comfort for me by which I will be able to serve wikipedia in a better way. I shall never use my account to violate wikipedia policy in future time and I promise to make constructive edits. I shall never make vandalism.

My unblock will not harm wikipedia in any way. I humbly request my unblock. Please! Please! Unblock me.

Sinner 15:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See above. Huon (talk) 23:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may not blank declined unblock requests. --bonadea contributions talk 14:44, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Miss Bonadea, I did not know that. Sinner (talk) 15:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider my request

@Yunshui and Yamla, Welcome! When I created this account, I had no concept of sockpuppetry. Now I had read Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and relevant account guidelines. I vow to follow these rules. I have completely abandoned this account and I promise I shall never use this account. I want to become a good user who follows all rules of wikipedia. Creating this account was my mistake. I don't want to be a sockpuppetier. I want to become a good user. I request please unblock this account and make it a retired user. Retired user can not make any vandalism, and I shall never use this account, so there will be no vandalism from this account. I humbly request please unblock this account, and make it a retired user. I shall be thankful. Sinner (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bilad il Islamia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for what I have been doing. I did not know rules of wikipedia at that time. Now I have read Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and and relevant account guidelines. I am using just that account. I shall never use this account. Please lift the block from this account and declare it as a retired user. As accounts are blocked just to save vandalism, and retired users can not make any vandalism. I ensure I shall not use this account. I want to contribute just with Nazim Hussain Pak, but being a sockpuppetier affects my career as a successful user and is a disgrace for me. I request please unblock this account and make it a retired user. Sinner (talk) 14:34, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think this account qualifies for Wikipedia:Clean start, and I don't see any reason to lift the block since the block log will always remain visible anyway, which somewhat invalidates the rationale. Alex Shih ^Talk 16:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alex Shih

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bilad il Islamia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I created this account, I had no concept of sock and I am very sorry for my past mistakes, and I swear I shall not break rules of wikipedia in coming time. I want to become a good user who is not sockpuppetier. I do not want to use this account with clean start, I have permanently left this account, but it is marked as my sock, and being a sockpuppetier affects me. I want to become a user who follows all rules, therefore, I request to unblock this account and make it inactive like declare it a retired user. This kind act can save me from being a sockpuppetier. Please unblock this account and mark it as a retired user. I shall be very thankful for making me not-sockpuppetier. Sinner (talk) 00:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. As stated above, the block log will always remain visible. We do not unblock confirmed sockpuppet accounts, ever. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.