User talk:Bijuts

Welcome!

Hello, Bijuts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 13:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thiruvananthapuram, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BINOY ^Talk 06:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerala Express. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BINOY ^Talk 07:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Ya, Its true. It is between Ernakulam and New Delhi making it the longest continuous electric run on IR (2842km). I'm sorry and thanks for informing me. Happy editing. BINOY ^Talk 08:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UA and city population

Hi Bijuts,
Thiruvananthapuram is the 2nd largest UA in Kerala. It is said in the UA article of Thiruvananthapuram itself. Please note that this is the city article. So there is no need for the statement. Thank you and Happy editing....!!! ;) BINOY ^Talk 13:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About 1 million figure

I don't understand what am i hiding. The figure there is just for a reference and note that the figure is not added by me. It is there for a long time. See here.

BINOY ^Talk 14:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Binoyjsdk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Trivandrum Central

Your edit on Trivandrum Central was reverted:[1]. You have mentioned in your edit summary, "Its a news letter only. Officially Shoranur junction is the largest railway station in kerla" . I am afraid, this is not a valid point. You cannot remove cited sources without providing a better or accurate reason. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan ^{(Talk to me..)} 08:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Rajithmohan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Warning

If you continue your slow edit-warring on Kochi article, you will be blocked. Please use other simple ways like WP:3O or WP:DISPUTE to handle content disputes. Thank you, --Chektomate (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Binoyjsdk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

October 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Stop removing categories from articles as you did in the Hyderabad, India, Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Pune etc... and stop biased writing as you did in the Kochi article. BINOY ^Talk 09:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Binoyjsdk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kochi, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. The commercial capital of the state is a cited information and it's described in Line 295 See this and you are continuously removing 2009 rankings of ease to start and operate a business which is a cited content. Also you violated The three-revert rule. Thank you. BINOY ^Talk 15:36, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits

Hi Biju, You are doing the same biased edits in the articles like you did recently at Kerala, Thrissur and Thiruvananthapuram. Please stop your biased editing. Thank you. BINOY ^Talk 07:35, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: TVC_platforms

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Rajithmohan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Trivandrum International Airport

Bijuts, Adding It is the second busiest airport in Kerala in terms of domestic and international traffic after Cochin International Airport is not needed in the Trivandrum city page. It is not of much relevance there, since we have a seperate article for the airport. So, it can be added in the Trivandrum International Airport page. Hope you will cease edit warring on that. Please reconsider your edits and self-revert your edits there, if possible. Also, please feel free to discuss about the changes, in the talk pages. Cheers, -- Rajith Mohan ^{(Talk to me..)} 08:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for edits in Main Central Road

Mr.Bijuts, I saw many messages related to the edit-wars in different pages. So, I hope I need not enlighten you about the consequences for edit-warring. Please discuss in the article talk page, if you have any concerns, do not revert the article. For your recent edits in Main Central page, please be aware that Angamaly is a place in Ernakulam district, and not in Kochi city. It is in the suburbs of Kochi city. Hence you cannot change the article to remove Ernakulam to replace with Kochi. Please reply in the article talk page (not in my talk page). If you continue with edit warring, you may be blocked without further notice. Thanks, --Chektomate (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr.Bijuts, Please stop reverting constantly , as you are doing in Main Central Road. You are already being warned for danger of violating the three-revert rule several times. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. If you revert again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Please discuss any disputed changes on the talk page. Thank you.--Induzcreed (talk) 16:03, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

. EdJohnston (talk) 20:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Railways

Hello Bijuts, From your contributions, I understood that you have a good knowledge in Southern Indian Railway related topics. I wish you could pitch in to expand the various railway stations in Kerala. The station list is here : "Category:Southern Railway (India) Zone" Thanks, --Chektomate (talk) 02:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kaloor-Kadavanthra Road

The article Kaloor-Kadavanthra Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable and unreferenced. Suggest adding content to an existing article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 06:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Air India Express, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Abhishek191288 (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U have to update yourself. Have a look at this. Now even after this if you make those changes, I will report to the admins for a block. —Abhishek191288 (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the sources talk about the future. They say IX has decided to shift its HQ. Here read this. Until and unless the HQ really shifts, do not change it (till it becomes a reality). —Abhishek191288 (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone who understands simple English will be able to tell that it is not a reality as yet. The Chairman must have signed to shift, but sentences in all the articles say that The HQ WOULD BE shifted. Would be obviously talks about the future. —Abhishek191288 (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COK

First of all go and find some other source for the claim, cite the same and it'll remain and won't be reverted. Any airport website can claim something about the airport and for such claims, the airport website cannot be accepted as a source. Even the Hyderabad airport website claims that it was the first public-private ventured airport in the country when even you do know that it was Kochi, and it also claims that the airport is the best in the world when there are several better airports across the world. So for your claim of Kochi being the fourth busiest, the airport as a source is not acceptable. Find some other source and feel free to add it. And a quick glance at your contribs indicates that you haven't gone beyond the boundaries of Kerala. Abhishek191288 (talk) 10:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I did not by a click do it to BIAL. I posted the same on the talk and with the opinion of other editors, I changed the same. Now there is a discussion going on about whether it has to remain or no!! :P Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 05:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW does CIAL conduct survey on other airport traffic that it proclaims itself on being the fourth busiest in terms of International traffic? As I told you some other source is required for the same and not CIAL website. In the case of Bangalore airport, it was only the annual traffic report and I did not add any claims of Bangalore airport by BIAL alone and no other site posting it, which you do. :P Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 05:40, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What reference have you given there? A 2007 survey!! Please find the latest, and why are you removing the seventh busiest fact? Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 10:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess a bold will make it visible for you here: The reference given dates back to 2007!!! And moreover with your edits, you are messing it up! Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 10:48, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking? And moreover you are the one who wants to reinstate that, so you do the honours of finding the latest reference. BTW about BIA being fourth busiest overall, it is from traffic figures and not mere claims by the airport! :P Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 10:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

First let me make some things clear. You are a fellow wikipedian and I respect you! Please find the latest trafiic stats and include the same. I'll be only too happy to leave it there. I'm not reverting it out of jealousy/madness. Earlier the CIAL website was given as a source to prove that COK was the 4th busiest in international traffic. My dear friend, I would like to as you, does CIAL conduct survey on other airports? You then removed it and now you cite a source dated back to 2007? Please please find the latest, I'll really be happy for it to remain there. Sometimes I do get aggresive. So if I've hurt you, I'm very sorry.Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 11:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right. But that is a 2007 survey my friend. Airports have grown enormously since then. Which is why I am asking you to try and get the latest survey by AAI. Include that and I'll will just not revert it. The article is equally yours friend! Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 11:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did I tell that AAI website is not a reliable source? I said that the reference you gave dates back to 2007, please inlcude a survey of 2010 there in your statement. Otherwise, I would either revert it or put a ^{[citation needed]} tag. Get the latest refernce my friend similar to the one you have given now! You can't consider a fact dating back to 2007 to still to be the same. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 11:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot consider the 2007 survey. AAI updates traffic stats every year. When there are new sources we should make use of them. You please find the latest by AAI. I am right now updating the destinations of some airports of India, else I would have done it myself. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 11:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I did not vandalise. He removed some info for which I reverted the same. NOw if you don't mind please include that reference in the sentence. Thanks, Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 11:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-added the source here my friend. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 11:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No other major aiport has city names listed in the busiest sentence!! Then why did you make these changes? Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 14:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since we have official absolute numbers for only one month (November 2010), i believe we should generally avoid these rankings,as a single month data isn't dependable. It is best we avoid the "busiest airport" rankings for now and wait for more data. (My mails to aai with request for more data are bouncing, so if you folks could mail them, we can clear this up)--Sodabottle (talk) 14:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected, i didnt see the third and fourth columns (duh). Eight months is pretty reliable, but it is not still the whole year. Correnct me if am wrong, but aren't seasonal variations in airline traffic annual?. Can we extrapolate for 12 months from 8 month traffic data?. But anyway 8 month data is way better than 2007 data. I think we can use it to rank the airports but should make it clear it is for the period of Apr-Nov 2008--Sodabottle (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is an ongoing discussion Mr. because of which the busiest rankings on both Chennai airport and Bangalore airport have been commented out which is why I restored it to the same. I edit several airport articles across the country. And I'm unlike you, DileepKS and Arunvarmaother who are so obssessed with Kerala related articles and keep promoting them. So please mind your tone. And moreover I have rollback rights. When I click on rollback, it reverts without any summary. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 14:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relax guys. It is just a clash of our perspectives. While Abishek is trying to maintain uniformity throughout the indian airport pages and make sure the claims made in them dont contradict, us others are more concentrated in maintaining our regional articles. I am sure we can thrash stuff out. I am moving part of conversation from my talk page here to ensure continuity.--Sodabottle (talk) 15:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just read your message on Bijuts' talk page. You said: It's we avoid the "busiest airport" rankings for now and wait for more data. I just wanted to know if this is applicable to only BLR and MAA or these airports as well: COK, CCU, HYD? Thanks, Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 14:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed my mind after Biju pointed out we have 8 month data (i didnt see it). I believe now we can reinstate the "busiest airport" sentences but with a clarification like. For the period of Apr-Nov 2010, XXXX airport is Yth busiest or something.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But how exactly should it be mentioned? Is busiest ranking in overall traffic enough or do we have to include the busiest ranking in terms of international traffic too separately? Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 15:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both preferably. I am drafting a sample sentence below:

For the period of Apr-Nov 2010, It was the xth busiest airport in terms of overall passenger traffic and yth busiest in terms of international passenger traffic

--Sodabottle (talk) 15:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

about Intl and domestic seperation, CIAL is the only exceptional.
CIAL will always be an exception for you, DileepKS69 and Arunvarmaother coz u have to promote it right? Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 15:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Shatabdi

Do not add "Junction" to the station names. It is understood. Until and unless the station is a different one, (Ernakulam town for eg), do not reinstate the same. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 16:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI I haven't touched the trivia section except for adding the image there. And coming to adding Jn is a name given to a station where two or more routes branch out from. Ernakulam station is ernakulam junction, if it is the other one then we have to write the entire name (Ernakulam town). The same exists for Bangalore. Why aren't you changing for Bangalore then? The Jan Shatabdi starts from Bangalore city junction station, it is also called only Bangalore station. It is the same for other stations as well. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 16:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of arguing further, let's look into the Indian railways website anout these stations. We'll change the name according to whatever is mentioned there. But don't revert the edit. Let's make a list of all the station names that need to be changed as per the website an make the necessary changes. You know I was very angry by the message you posted on Sodabottle's page about favourite article and getting emotional (I hope you won't do that again) for which I almost blindly reverted your changes to Jan Shatabdi and didn't even respond to you when you asked me about Kolkata airport. Anyways, I want to forget the past and as fellow wikipedians, let's not edit war again, but instead let's talk it out and make necessary changes (sometimes you revert even before I post a message with some explanation). I'm sorry if I have hurt you. And lastly please don't make request like you did on my talk like this: take it as a request. I'm not the person to solely decide on article content. As I told previously, from now on let's sort out any differences (go for a 3PO if necessary) and make necessary changes. Thanks, have a nice day. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 19:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to your query about Kolkata airport, it is ranked 7th busiest merely because it has lesser international flights. It has got nothing to do with being the 3rd largest metro. Take for example Kochi airport, though it ranks 7th overall, it ranks 4th in terms of international flights. This is because, Kochi has lots of connectivity to the gulf, which even Kolkata, Bangalore and Hyderabad do not have. Moreover there are not 1 flight per day by an airline but more on some sectors from Kochi. Earlier Kolkata used to be the 3rd busiest overal and internationally. Bangalore which wasn't even an International airport until 1998, has managed to outbeat Kolkata. Several airlines have stopped flying to Kolkata which earlier used to be very well connected to seceral international destinations. I hope you could understand. Please feel free to ask me any more queries. TC Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 19:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure. But I believe we'll rename the stations to whatever is mentioned in the railways website. I hope that should be fine! Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 16:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for changing the station names. But I have to remove your addition about Kerala having 2 Jan Shatabdis on the same route as it is not the only one to have that. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 13:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at your contribs, I notice you do not provide an edit summary for your edits unless you are reverting somebody's edits. It is very important to provide an edit summary per WP:ES. Please follow this from your next edit onwards. Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 14:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Why so serious? ^{Talk to me} 16:10, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Binoyjsdk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sampark Kranti

Dear Biju, I didn't said that it stops in all the stations. I said that it only stops in important stations. That means all the stations are important in each way. The only station i found a difference from all the stations is New Delhi station. Lower4th . TalK 09:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Thiruvananthapuram has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. BINOY ^Talk 14:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ya, every one who opposes your biased edits are same, I am Lower fourth, Chektomate, Binoyjsdk, SpacemanSpiff, Josebejoy, Salih, Aarem etc... Lower4th . TalK 09:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

a persons dignity is not identified by the language or how he looks. it's by the works done by him.

and i don't think i used "bad words" before. I also think you and user.wiskey are same. that's why i mentioned you as his son before. and If not, jst ignore this. and I expect much more ~~descency~~ decency from you in future. (not from your language, by your works). Lower4th . TalK 09:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Binoyjsdk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Bijuts. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

WARNING

This is your last warning; the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Samaleks (talk) 10:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

This is your last warning; the next time you make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.--Samaleks (talk) 10:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or undone. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice.--Samaleks (talk) 10:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
Message added 14:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

In reference to your postings in Thiruvananthapuram talk page and general edit behavior

Dear Bijuts, I wish you could contribute more constructively without being so much biased (in favour of Kochi and against Thiruvananthapuram). Please remember a few points :

You may contact me or other senior editors for any kind of help in wiki-editing. Happy editing :-) Cheers, -- Aarem ^(Talk) 10:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
Message added 00:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TVC

Dear Biju, Check Talk:Trivandrum_Central#Information_that_may_help. There are some information, which may help you in your editing. Cheers, -- Aarem ^(Talk) 03:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: ALLEGATION OF IP EDIT WARS/SOCK ETC - MARCH 2011

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Aarem's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
Message added 3:47 pm, Today (UTC+5.5). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

NH-17

Dear Biju, Pray enlighten the criteria for "Important Places" in your edit to Kochi. The said subject is in discussion raised by User:DileepKS in Talk:Kochi. Please voice your opinions there so that a consensus can be reached instead of reverting edits. rams81 (talk) 13:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, did not notice that it was your user page :).My apologies rams81 (talk) 03:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on WikiProject Trains

Hello Bijuts,
Over at WikiProject Trains there is a discussion about some rail services in India; since you have created some articles on this subject, your input would be very welcome. bobrayner (talk) 10:48, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chennai – Trivandrum Superfast Express for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chennai – Trivandrum Superfast Express is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chennai – Trivandrum Superfast Express until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jenks24 (talk) 07:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussion

Hi there, I saw your comment at the above-mentioned AfD discussion where, at one point, you asked something along the lines of "what makes this non-notable to Wikipedia?" Well, to prove that this train service is notable, you should try and show in the AfD that it meets the general notability guideline. Basically if you show that the train service has received significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources, then it is highly likely that the closing administrator will keep the article. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 11:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, to find out what Wikipedia finds notable and non-notable, please read Wikipedia:Notability. However, that is a pretty long guideline and to summarise, it essentially boils down to "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article". So, again, if you want to prove that this train service is notable in Wikipedia's terms, please find some sources (eg newspaper articles, books, reliable websites) that provide in-depth coverage of the train service. I hope that answered your question, but if you are still unsure about anything, feel free to ask me. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's good. I was just about to tell you to add them to the AfD, but you already had. If you find more sources like this I encourage you to add them to the AfD page (and also to the article if possible, though that is not required). The only concern may be whether the coverage is significant enough to count as "significant coverage". Personally I'm not sure at the moment and I'm willing to wait for others (especially bobrayner who has much more experiance with train articles than myself) to comment on the discussion. Thanks for the effort you have put in, Jenks24 (talk) 12:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please dont act as a MEAT PUPPET for KOCHI topics

Dear Biju, you are contributing well to wikipedia, in the railway related topics. But, please donot act as a MEAT PUPPET for User:DileepKS69 and co. Just by doing so will do no good in your wiki life, but instead you may invite more bans. Hence I request you to concentrate on your favourite topics and do not be a WP:MEAT for those users from Kochinow/skyscrapercity forums. --Samaleks (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC) verum oru Konjanan !!!! --Samaleks (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reverts in Kerala

Dear Biju, you are now experienced enough in wiki, and please donot open trigger another series of reverts in the page.
Kochi is called the commercial capital of Kerala, unofficially. There is no such term when defining the administrative terms or for beaurocratic purposes. It is an unofficial adjective to the city like "Queen of the Arabian Sea", "Cultural capital", "Venice of the East", etc. Hence that information need not be added there.
Cheers, -- Aarem ^(Talk)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kerala. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 17:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Biju, As I told above, "commercial capital" is an adjective to the city; not official status. There is nothing like commercial capital or cultural capital or knowledge capital when a state is defined for administrative purposes. Please do not re-insert this in the Kerala page. I wish you could contribute to wiki adhering to Neutral POV. Cheers, -- Aarem ^(Talk)

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Aarem's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Templates for Railway divisions and networks

1. You may help in improving these two templates : Palakkad_Railway_Division and Trivandrum_Railway_Division.

Please add the stations there correctly. The group ONE in Palakkad, is wrong. Please correct it. Once done, you may create similar for all other railway divisions in Southern railways.

2. Take a look at these two references : security and economy. This will help in expanding and improving Palakkad Railway Division article.

Cheers, -- Aarem ^(Talk) 10:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Palakkad Railway Division

You check my contributions to see what good things I have done here; definitely its not like your immature edit behavior who was already banned once from Wiki :-) --Samaleks (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I saw your edit in Aarem's talk page under heading "Recent reverts in Kerala". That itself shows your behavior towards a senior and respected editor like him. --Samaleks (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evergreen city in Trivandrum, and Queen of Arabian Sea in Kochi lead. Now what you want? Commercial capital is not an official one; but it is mentioned in the economy section in Kochi page. Dont edit kiddish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.193.160.10 (talk) 11:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Do not editwar on articles and try to push your POV. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or undone. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. By the recent edit behaviour you are showing, it is very evident that another block is quite round the corner. --Samaleks (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Please do not edit war in Kerala, Kochi and Trivandrum pages to push your POV. From all the warnings that were issued to you, I hope you are aware that using anonymous IPs / Socks to evade block also will result in a block. Please refrain from unconstructive editing. Use the talk page for dispute resolution. --Samaleks (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repentless

You seem very repentless despite your block for edit warring. I have noticed you POV pushing Kochi on several articles. Do not edit war even if you are right. Two editors have disagreed with you on Kerala, and when this happens, you have to discuss on the talk page or request for a third party opinion to resolve the dispute. These two edits: [2] and [3] seem to be done by you. If you do not stop your POV pushing and edit warring, I'm gonna have to open a discussion about you at the appropriate forum and include a note on possible sockpuppetry done by you as seen from the above two edits. If the above problems related to you do not end even after this, remember you may be blocked indefinitely from editing. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 15:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and personal attacks

Now I see this personal attack from you at Talk:Kochi: "Expect a meaningful opinion from the user:Aarem than silly useless arguments." As others have told you, edit warring is against Wikipedia policy. If you find yourself unable to convince other editors on the talk page, you are advised to let it go. See WP:Dispute resolution for some options you may consider. When you added the phrase 'commercial capital' you did not provide any source. If you continue to revert against consensus and attack other editors admins may decide to block your account. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:30, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been ignoring all feedback regarding Kochi, and you are continuing to revert there. It is likely that you will be blocked. If you will agree to wait for consensus before editing again, you may be able to avoid sanctions. EdJohnston (talk) 19:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have gone ahead and blocked your account, in view of the fact that I had specifically warned you that any more edit warring on your part would result in a block [4]. Please take the next 24 hours off to consider the unacceptable behavior of edit warring, incivility, and for that matter, templating the regulars (it is irrelevant wheter someone else did it to you first... WP:NOTTHEM). Please understand I have no vendetta against you or your point of view; this block is based solely on behavior. You may request unblock via the instructions on the block page, but I recommend reading the guide to appealing unblocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kerala. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. —Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 16:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

What are you not getting about this? Stop edit warring, please. If you continue to edit war, your account will be permanently blocked, and you yourself will no longer be welcome to edit Wikipedia. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Magog the Ogre's talk page.
Message added 19:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:47, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala

You have started your edit war again on Kerala. Per WP:BRD, when an editor disagrees with you, yo should not reinstate the edits but instead discuss and gain consensus. I strongly recommend you to go through WP:BRD. Well if you would like to continue editing wikipedia, i suggest you to heed to the warning given to you. — Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 05:48, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 06:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment here instead of edit warring. — Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 11:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bijuts. You have new messages at Abhishek191288's talk page.
Message added 13:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Abhishek ^{Talk to me} 13:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Bijuts,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

KOCHI into Infoboxes

Please refrain from adding Kochi to the residence section of Infoboxes indiscriminately, without any substantial, valid and accepted proof. Wikipedia is not a place to promote Kochi like that. Kochi will not become greater by adding it to the residence section of actors. You are going even to the extend of claiming places like Aluva as part of Kochi.
Anish Viswa 04:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where you got a reference, place the reference, else it will be considered as unreferenced claim only. Please don't use the kochi UA, but only Kochi proper as per Kochi article in wikipedia(In the infoboxes, you linked to Kochi and not to Kochi UA). Kochi UA makes no sense in the residence infobox (residence itself make not much sense).
Anish Viswa 06:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add to the above point made by AnishViswa. Bijuts is keeping on adding Kochi to all articles, without any valid point. It seems that you are a constant POV pusher for Kochi. I could see from your contributions, you are editing all possible pages to add the word "Kochi" in it. You even edited places very far from Kochi to push your POV.

Eg: You edited Koovappady which is very far from Kochi(even 10kms from Perumbavoor)

Adding residence to the article makes no sense and no value-addition to the article. Also, the residences of celebrities often changes from time to time. For eg; Mammootty was in Chennai, and recently moved to Kochi and still owns the Chennai house. Mohanlal own houses in Ooty, Chennai, Dubai, Kochi, Thiruvananthapuram etc. He may shift his residence frequently. How you can be sure that he is residing at your given address? So, adding their place of residence makes no sense. Please try to be more constructive in wikipedia rather than edit-warring for Kochi. And I request you to please stop this edit-warring. --Vythiri (talk) 03:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For a Keralite residing within Kerala, place of residence is not a relevant information. If a person is staying in another state or Country than his birth state or Country of Nationality, then it has some significance, provided the stay is of some permanent nature (Property owned, Citizenship applied, political protection sought etc.). Similarly, if famous personalities from other states or Countries are staying permanently in Kochi, that information can be added, with relevant reference sources.
Anish Viswa 04:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING

Even after facing blocks 3 times, you are still edit-warring in articles for pushing your POV. I am afraid that if you continue your warring attitude, you may get blocked for a longer period. Please learn to go in harmony with other editors. Thank you, --Samaleks (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Sam Aleks. I dont understand your intention of going around Wikipedia and warning people when your own talk page is probably full of warnings. Let us realize one fact - the truth will always remain the truth. Wiki is not one of those biased internet forums sometimes handled by a biased highhanded moderator. We are all watching wikipedia. - 59.93.8.87 (talk) 07:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial capital

Biju, The adjective "Commercial Capital" is already discussed before in the article talk page of Kochi. I am afraid that you are opening another edit war by adding that again in the lead. "Commercial capital" is not an official status, and it is already added in the Economy section, where it aptly fits. The reference is also given there. Please do not add again in the lead against the consensus. Thanks, --Samaleks (talk) 02:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of Two Weeks for Disruptive Editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DileepKS69 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Air India Express HQ

Hi! I took a look at this edit. The problem is, the Air India Express HQ is still in Mumbai, as indicated by the official website WhisperToMe (talk) 09:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bijuts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually I was an an innocent victim of block activity. I never knew what was happened. Actually I do not know who is this Dileepks69 (the reason for block related to this user name). i did so many edits in Kochi related pages which are clearly with government sources as reference. And I still believe I never did anything wrong here against wikipedia policies. So here I request you to unblock my user id "bijuts".

Accept reason:

Welcome back. You may want to take a look at WP:MEAT in case that was relevant to your block (it apparently was relevant to Dileepks69). Huon (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bijuts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22343 was submitted on Aug 12, 2018 08:01:54. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Subhash Chandra Bose Road, Kochi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhash Chandra Bose Road, Kochi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhash Chandra Bose Road, Kochi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EclipseDude (talk) 10:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roads in Kochi

Instead of making non notable articles on individual roads, why dont you merge all of the road articles into one article and name it Roads in Kochi or Transport in Kochi. as of now all of them are worth deleting. kindly consider my request and tag these individual articles as WP:CSD#G7. regards --DBig Xrayᗙ 20:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bijuts. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]