User talk:Bigbrothersorder

Love people,love world.for equality among all classes,thanks.This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Lerdthenerd (talk) 15:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CAP lock and civility

Please do not write in full capitals in your edit summaries, it is considered rather poor etiquette and shouting. People will pay less attention to what you have to say if you do that. Also, edit summaries like "ITS A FACT" or "READ A BOOK" are totally unhelpful. Wikipedia does not accept "FACTS", we accept verified, neutral and cited statements, not whatever you may have read or know from a book but can't or won't provide a citation for. Your edits, particularly if they are not neutral or compromise the integrity of the article in the eyes of the majority of the Wikipedia community, will be continually reverted with justification if you pursue this current editing style. Thank you, S.G.^(GH) _ping! 15:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bigbrothersorder! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Blue Rasberry 15:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Meenas, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meenas

You seem to be engaged in an edit war on the Meenas article. I can see lots of evidence of you reverting others' changes, but no evidence at all of you engaging in a reasoned discussion on the article talk page. I strongly urge you to desist from simply reverting, and rather to argue the matter rationally out on talk:Meenas. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 15:25, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meenas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've ignored the above warnings, and continued to edit war. Consequently I've blocked your account from editing. When that block is over, you are expected to discuss the dispute on the article talk page, I told you above. If instead you resume warring, you'll be blocked again, likely indefinitely. -- Finlay McWalter ☻ Talk 15:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Agnivanshitribalmeenas. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 17:20, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you are inserting into the article is what you believe is fact. you are supplying no evidence whatsoever. Your edits will be reverted until you discuss your proposed changes on the talk page first. Stop edit warring and provide some evidence for your ideas. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 17:21, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on multiple accounts

Hi. Wikipedia has a policy in place where editors cannot have more than one account. As such, I've blocked Agnivanshitribalmeenas (talk · contribs). In the future, please only use this account when editing, or you may find yourself indefinitely blocked. Also please remember to log in when you edit, as editing anonymously can also appear to be getting around the rules. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Your addition to Rajasthan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images.Dougweller (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, your edits show you've read this, so I expect you to heed the warning. Dougweller (talk) 15:02, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references to articles

I notice you have been putting partial reference information in your edit summaries instead of in the body of the article where they belong. Please read Wikipedia:Reference#How to format inline citations for a quick guide on how to place citations in articles. Properly citing your sources ensures that content you have added can be checked by other editors, can help establish that your edits are not original research, and improves the likelihood that your edits will be accepted by other editors. Any additions you make without including proper references may be challenged and removed. AtticusX (talk) 11:39, 4 November 2010

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rajasthani people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Onef9day^Talk! 12:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

==January 2011==HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL HUMAN BEINGS 2011Bigbrothersorder (talk) 06:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring at Meenas

A complaint about your edits was filed at WP:AN3#Slow-moving edit war on Meenas (Result: Semi, warning). You may still respond there if you wish. You are expected to cease edit warring at the Meenas article, or a block may ensue. Do not revert again on the subject of tribe vs. caste without first getting consensus from the other editors on the talk page. Note that putting the names of references in your edit summaries is useless; add them to the article if you think they are appropriate. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

may we live in a world at peace and with the awareness of God's love in every sunset, every flower's unfolding petals, every baby's smile, every lover's kiss, and every wonderful, astonishing, miraculous beat of our heart. Happiness deep down within. Serenity with each sunrise. Success in each facet of your life. Family beside you. Close and caring friends. Health, inside you. Love that never ends. Special memories of all the yesterdays. A bright today with much to be thankful for. A path that leads to beautiful tomorrows. Dreams that do their best to come true. Appreciation of all the wonderful things about you.

• All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. ^ Top

• Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. ^ Top

• Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person. ^ Top

• No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms. ^ Top

• No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. ^ Top

• Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. ^ Top

• All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.Today in our country for equality among forward classes and backward class,there is a strong need of obc/sc/st reservation in billion dollor corporate world and trillion dollor private sector. Being a good human let us try for the well being of 80crore People. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbrothersorder (talk • contribs)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Dalit, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diannaa ^(Talk) 06:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]