User talk:BiasThug

Look, you need to stop with these provocations. Adding a picture of OJ as a lead image of Negro or Mulatto‎; adding Malcolm X to List of gay, lesbian or bisexual people, etc. If you continue with these edits you will be restricted from making further contributions here. Thanks in advance. El_C 01:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance. El_C 01:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock reviewed|1=imaging is suitable and instructive in both cases (single image illustrative of variant appearance), and there is accepted and reliable sourcing for the last - http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1486997,00.html If you fear sources than join talk for discussion of same rather than bullying and suppressing as you have and do.|decline=The edits were particuarly disruptive, and when warned, you did not stop. Your block expires after 24 hours. It is designed to prevent disruption.— Mercury 04:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)}}[reply]

You're also a sock of someone I know, you know who you are...Hayden? Jeeny ^(talk) 01:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So if i was 'Hayden' I would have the slightest idead who or what 'Jeeny' is. Unfortunately (for you) I don't and nor do i care to.

Ah, Karen aka Lukas. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeeny (talk • contribs) 02:14, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to the substance of the unblock request. And that means the opposite of guessing a couple more irrelevant names that don't mean anything to anybody involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BiasThug (talk • contribs)

Obviously, the above also applies to adding LGBT wikiproject tags to the talk page of that article. El_C 11:34, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best thing would have been not to revert me on the talk page after this warning. El_C 13:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BiasThug (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

woeful case of User:El C indulging in the abuse admin tools to bully myself for providing sources and content that he/she/it is bent on suppressing - in a style clearly against the spirit and informational purposes of the project. Of course, the brainy and untypical thing said persistent reverter would have beem better inspired to do is to actually EXAMINE the information from the sources it seeks to suppress and make the effort to participate in talkpage discussion about it ... something which is found easily within the dignity and manners of the rest of us. Noting that and presuming your concurrence, demand for unblock is made.—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Decline reason:

I see you're not done being uncivil. Therefore I am declining this request.— SQL^{(Query Me!)} 15:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Adding the tag has nothing to do with an attempt to facilitate discussion, it simply repeats the point you were advancing on the article. El_C 13:42, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be an adult and learn to examine sources and discuss first rather than blocking and bullying to get your way. That's the suggestion. Its what talk pages are there for. So I'm to blame because a favourite historical figure of yours indulged bisexual activity as a youth and freely chose to suck a few dicks for kicks at the time he was a young adult & what's more has been called on it by his biographer and close associates. Facts like those assert themselves, which is something you'll have to get over. Meanwhile you really are seen for being a disgraceful bully with a short fuse informing the actions you take. Regarding that, marvellous if you improve your act in said regard from now on. Aspire to it.BiasThug 13:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In light of that "suck a few dicks for kicks" comment, I've extended your block to indefinite, as it appears increasingly clear that, notwithstanding some maintenance taska, the account purpose is provocation and disruption. I am also protecting the page so as to prevent you from continuing from making further similar comments. Another admin can lift either, or both, if they so choose. El_C 14:23, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]