User talk:Bhlab
Bhlab, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:16, Tuesday, November 5, 2024 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Minor edits
[edit]Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Halloween, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 19:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Halloween, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:57, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Halloween shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bhlab reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: ). Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Halloween, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Halloween. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indef for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC) |